An overwhelming number of risk advisers have supported the idea that the federal government should incentivise Australians to take up risk insurance.
In a survey conducted by Risk Adviser, readers were asked whether they believe the federal government should introduce incentives to take up life insurance.
Of the 250 readers who participated in the survey, 78.4 per cent (or 196 respondents) believed that the government should introduce incentives, whereas 21.6 per cent, or 54, believed it should not.
Speaking to Risk Adviser, MediBroker managing director Aaron Zelman said introducing an incentive to buy insurance could make a “significant difference” in tackling the nationwide underinsurance problem.
Mr Zelman added that a government co-payment such as a ‘first insurance owners grant’ would be a great benefit to encouraging more Australians to take up risk insurance.
“Even if the level of co-payment was relatively small, there could be great benefit in having the government promote this scheme, raising awareness around the underinsurance issue,” Mr Zelman said.
“There would also be a tie in to the next generation of policy owners who are already aware of first home owners’ grants and would be keen to take advantage,” he said.
Echoing Mr Zelman’s comments, Blenkhorn Financial Planning principal Julia Blenkhorn told Risk Adviser that the introduction of incentives would be a “win-win for all”.
“It would reduce the reliance on sickness benefits and the disability pension that currently runs into millions of dollars,” Ms Blenkhorn said.
“When you read the plethora of statistics regarding the state of health of Australians, coupled with the findings that we have one of the highest life expectancies in the world, it would be apparent that it is in our interests as a nation to have as many people covered by life insurance as we can,” she said.
However, Marshall Wealth and Investment Advisers principal Mark Marshall pointed out that introducing an incentive is not a suitable solution.
“There has to be a need before the consumer will properly engage,” Mr Marshall said. "For example, in most states of Australia, self-employed persons are not covered by their state’s workers compensation scheme.
“The self-employed cannot enter into an industrial, mine or construction workplace without having in place appropriate level of sickness and accident insurance cover.
“What if an employer takes into account an applicant’s personal insurance portfolio as part of their employment application?” Mr Marshall asked.
“How long before everyone has their own personal insurance portfolio. A change in the foundation of social norms will produce the desired behaviour,” he added.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 17 Dec 2018AMP challenged by ASIC on fees for service conductBy Eliot Hastie
- 17 Dec 2018FASEA names provider for adviser examBy Adrian Flores
- 17 Dec 2018Former Liberal leader to join Crescent boardBy Adrian Flores
- 14 Dec 2018ASIC clarifies RG 146 requirements for advisersBy Adrian Flores
- 14 Dec 2018Sargon Capital acquires listed robo adviserBy James Mitchell
- 14 Dec 2018Industry body flags CPD burden under FASEA proposalBy Adrian Flores
- view all