X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Coalition leads Labor among advisers, Morrison preferred PM: New survey shows

EXCLUSIVE Financial advisers are overwhelmingly voting Liberal at the next election, a new survey has found.

by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
February 21, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A new survey of more than 3,000 businesses across several key sectors, including financial advice and wealth management, has revealed overwhelming support for a Coalition government, with over half of the survey respondents confident Scott Morrison will remain Prime Minister.

The current PM was preferred by a majority of respondents over Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese, with the greatest margin seen in mortgage lending, closely followed by the financial advice and wealth management sector.

X

According to the survey conducted by Momentum Media’s research house Momentum Intelligence, financial advisers overwhelmingly prefer a Coalition government, with as many as 60 per cent of respondents noting their intention to vote Liberal at the upcoming federal election. Conversely, only 27 per cent said they intend to vote Labor.

Momentum Intelligence Industry Insight Report found participants from Australia’s financial advice and wealth management sector indicated that their most prominent considerations ahead of the election are the economy (75 per cent), small-business interests (58 per cent), taxation (52 per cent), climate change & environment (38 per cent) and defence & national security (35 per cent).

On the other end of the scale, equal last at 12 per cent, were humanitarian concerns and gender, diversity & inclusion.

Commenting on industry-specific issues, a Coalition voter conceded that while the federal government has been “taking a torch” to the advice industry for years, “I will still likely vote Liberal”.

“Bungled policy for financial advisers has led to an extreme disdain toward them, and ASIC. Labor is looking at this very closely, indeed they just presented at an industry event promising to repeal some of the legislation that advisers dislike in the industry. I’m not against the education requirements, as a young planner I am nearly finished [with] my qualification,” the respondent said.

“I do worry that the red tape has gone far too far and now I cannot take on board or service small clients profitably. I will still likely vote Liberal, but if Labor continue to make announcements that will make my industry more enjoyable, and easier to service smaller clients, they will get my vote.”

Another Coalition voter shared a similar sentiment, noting “the financial planning industry is being strangled with regulation and compliance. However I don’t see any changes in these respects irrespective of the outcome of the federal election.”

More insights to come.

Tags: Advisers

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 30

  1. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    > Commenting on industry-specific issues, a Coalition voter conceded that while the federal government has been “taking a torch” to the advice industry for years, “I will still likely vote Liberal”.

    Quite literally voting against your own interests.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Do you seriously think Labor will make it easier for anyone except Industry super funds………….

      Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    How could anyone vote for Morrison and the Libs? What has this appalling government achieved? Too many failures to count and so much opportunity lost at a time the country desperately needs a vision for the future, leadership, decency and good management.

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    Did they survey any of those Tik Tok advisers that Jane Hume let off the hook?

    Reply
  4. The Naked Adviser says:
    4 years ago

    I for one won’t be subscribing to the Stockholm syndrome again and voting LNP. The legalise Cannabis Party or the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party can have my vote.

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    As an adviser, my vote will not be going with which party will make financial advice easier. I will be voting for the party that I think is best for Australia.

    That said, it is hard, because I don’t agree with so many thing the LNP have done (or not done), but I am worried Labor don’t actually stand for anything except Albo isn’t Scomo.

    Reply
    • Bowl is empty says:
      4 years ago

      Don’t forget Clive (I’m joking)

      Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Pretty sure a healthy Financial Advice Sector leads to a healthy Country.

      Reply
      • Anonymous says:
        4 years ago

        Data to support this?

        Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    Its typical to have more of the same and expect a different result. The Mortgage Industry votes in favour…laugh out loud…of course as larger mortgages mean larger commissions…of course they would. So, this best interest stuff means nothing to these brokers who get an ongoing commission for doing nothing….much like the current fools in the Libs, Labor, Greens etc. Bling leading the visually impaired !!!!

    Reply
  7. Ballot Boxer says:
    4 years ago

    How many advisers would be interested in running as independents? Probably your best chance yet of being elected, given the apathy towards the major parties and the alternatives. And if you last enough, there’s a generous pension, inflation-linked for life, for doing nothing – no annual agreements required.

    Reply
    • Cam says:
      4 years ago

      Actually the parliamentary pension is only available for members elected prior to 2004. Anyone running for elected office now might have to be motivated by non-pecuniary factors!!

      Reply
  8. Michelle says:
    4 years ago

    Most likely the Advisers voting Labor entered the industry post 2009. They weren’t around to see a combination of FoFA and Labor try and eliminate Advisers from the face of the earth or alternatively work at AwareSuper, Hesta Super etc etc. Those of us that went through FoFA will remember the ISN running the country and giving instructions to the Prime Minster on Advice matters. Something that ultimately drove up the cost of Advice.

    Reply
    • ex-Liberal says:
      4 years ago

      FOFA was great compared with what the Liberals have done to the industry. They grandfathered things.

      Reply
  9. Andrew says:
    4 years ago

    Whilst I don’t think the election will have a major impact on the industry, Jane Hume has done an appalling job.

    Reply
  10. Mark DiPietro says:
    4 years ago

    Voting Liberal or National means voting for Scomo as PM. Goodness gracious me!! Anyone but him. He is the most spineless PM (or even politician) this country has ever had. For the sake of Australia’s future, he must go.

    Reply
  11. JoJo says:
    4 years ago

    I would normally vote Libs but I am considering going with Labor – this government is the most useless government this country has had in a while. They are all about the power for the sake of power rather than serving the country.

    Reply
    • Research your vote. says:
      4 years ago

      Whilst I agree with your sentiment, sadly Labor is not the answer. I’d really urge you to have a look at policies and legislation they have supported or championed over the last few years (Or look at the Premiers) to see what you will be signing up for.

      Reply
  12. Adviser says:
    4 years ago

    Seems quite high the first preference vote going to Liberal and Labor. Both have failed. Labor however will be worse then Liberal. Liberals have been a big disappointment.

    Reply
  13. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    I still believe that since voting is mandatory, we should have a “no confidence vote”. This would tell parties that they need to do a better job. Stop arguing and get on with the business of running the country and serving the citizens! Neither party deserves my vote!

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      The only issue with this is what then happens. I agree that both major political parties are the equivalent of walking through a dog park with no shoes on but someone needs to be running the joint — or maybe they don’t and we can try that

      Reply
  14. Alex says:
    4 years ago

    Neither the Coalition or Labor getting my vote ever again, no matter what they promise. Time for a change in this country and get some new parties to govern.

    Reply
    • DogEatDog says:
      4 years ago

      Totally agree, unfortunately this two party preferred nonsense means it will be extremely difficult to ever get another party in. They won’t be getting my vote either and at the bottom of my list will be the Greens, followed by Labour and the Coalition

      Reply
  15. Ex CFP says:
    4 years ago

    Tough decision between the Libs who hate advisers and the ALP who just want industry funds and big banks

    Reply
  16. Dan says:
    4 years ago

    When you publish more insights from that survey can you publish more about the actual survey ie where was it conducted, where those surveyed actual planner or business owners / managers and some of the actual questions asked. Thanks

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Probably surveyed the two financial planners from MAFS…one of whom is unlicenced and the other is a client services officer…

      Reply
  17. Herbert says:
    4 years ago

    That’s no surprise, no matter how un-helpful the Libs have been, Labor/left don’t like Adviser’s – that side of politics has always been anti-Adviser…it’s a safer slightly more sensible approach to support the Libs.

    Reply
  18. Jimmy says:
    4 years ago

    How anyone with integrity could vote for Scott Morrison is beyond me….

    Reply
    • Jenny says:
      4 years ago

      Because when I look at voting for Albo instead, my skin crawls….

      Reply
  19. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    Bit of an indictment on the industry to be frank.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited