Is annual engagement the fee model of the future?

With clients now required to opt-in to ongoing fee arrangements annually, one compliance expert has argued that annual engagements are the superior model to efficiently execute regulatory obligations.

In a recent blog post on the FPA’s Money & Life site, AFSL Compliance’s Stewart Chandler said engaging clients on an annual basis could help to reduce paperwork and simplify fee arrangements on both sides.

“An annual engagement ... sets out services to be provided and fees to be paid over a 12-month period. The engagement expires at the end of the 12-month period. If the client does not enter a new engagement, the practice ceases charging fees,” Mr Chandler explained.

“The obligation to provide an annual FDS only applies to ongoing fee arrangements. It does not apply to annual engagements. This has always seemed logical to me as the annual engagement by itself meets the intent of the FOFA reforms.”


Mr Chandler said the annual engagement method was a no-brainer for advisers given it was more FOFA-compliant than ongoing fee arrangements, and encouraged a more engaged client base that could boost a practice’s valuation.

“In the early days there was a widely held view that practices would hurt their valuations by adopting the annual engagement model as clients may choose to walk away. It provided less certainty in the future income stream and the preferred approach was an FDS, which was less likely to disturb the existing income stream,” he said.

“Today, that view has turned 180 degrees. Practices with highly engaged clients are valued more highly and annual engagement is a compelling test of this.”

However, Mr Chandler cautioned that advice practices using an annual engagement model would still need to comply with the FASEA standards, which required formal engagements from clients for one-off and commission-based services as well as ongoing services.

But it could provide more flexibility for ongoing advice clients in terms of the time between a review and a fee agreement being put in place, he said.

“For example, a client may have their annual review in April each year. At the completion of the review, they would receive an ROA and a proposed annual engagement for the period 1 July to 30 June. The same would apply each year,” Mr Chandler said.

“This approach provides some margin for error where the annual review is delayed or clients take some time to consider and respond to the annual engagement.”

Is annual engagement the fee model of the future?
Is annual engagement the fee model of the future
ifa logo
Comments have been disabled for this article

Subscribe to the ifa bulletin

Receive daily online news,analysis, reports and business strategies
By signing up you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

from the web

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real time and stay up to date with content that matters to you.