ASIC has begun civil proceedings against the Commonwealth Bank for alleged market manipulation in 2012, making it the last of the big four banks to face the courts over the incident.
In a statement, the corporate regulator alleged that the Commonwealth Bank had engaged in “unconscionable conduct” to affect the bank bill swap reference rate (BBSW), which is the primary interest rate benchmark used in Australia.
ASIC has already commenced proceedings against ANZ, NAB and Westpac, with the former two reaching a settlement, while Westpac’s case is still being seen.
The regulator alleges that the Commonwealth Bank’s actions, which occurred between January and October 2012, were intended to “maximise its profits or minimise its losses” in a way that was detrimental to those holding positions opposite to the bank’s.
“ASIC alleges it was unconscionable for CBA to trade in this way, and also to enter into products priced off the BBSW without disclosing its trading practices to its customers and counterparties,” the regulator said in a statement.
“ASIC also alleges that CBA's trading created an artificial price and a false appearance with respect to the market for some of these products.”
The regulator is seeking declarations that the bank “contravened s12CA, s12CB, s12DA, 12DB and s12DF of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act), s912A(1), s1041A, s1041B and s1041H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)”.
“Further, ASIC has sought from the court pecuniary penalties against CBA and an order requiring CBA to implement a compliance program,” the regulator said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 24 Jan 2019Former Dover and Synchron adviser banned for five yearsBy Eliot Hastie
- 24 Jan 2019Very few Australians save and even fewer invest their moneyBy Reporter
- 24 Jan 2019Advisers undercharging clients for efforts, says CEOBy Adrian Flores
- 23 Jan 2019Adelaide adviser permanently banned from industryBy Eliot Hastie
- 23 Jan 2019Bowen slams ‘woeful’ handling of royal commissionBy James Mitchell
- 23 Jan 2019Gender super gap lower but still at 34%By Adrian Flores
- view all