Super fund disclosure rules inequitable: ISA

Super fund disclosure rules inequitable: ISA

Industry Super Australia has railed against ASIC’s Regulatory Guide 97, arguing the new fee disclosure rules introduced in the guidance will make it difficult for consumers to compare super funds. 

According to a SuperRatings report commissioned by Industry Super Australia, ASIC Regulatory Guide 97 does improve transparency of fees in some respects, but it lacks “simple comparability” for consumers.

“Ultimately, the reality remains that most Australians will be unable to explicitly see either the source of these fees or clearly understand them,” according to the ISA report.

Commenting on the research, ISA public affairs director Matthew Linden said, “The new super rules are more likely to mislead consumers than help them.

“This is a litmus test for the government that claims to be on the side of super fund members, or favouring the retail and bank-owned super funds.”

“Inconsistent treatment” of investment vehicles was pinpointed in the report as a concern.

“For example, disclosure mechanisms by platforms and superannuation funds are very different, to the point whereby a normal investor may believe that an investment through a platform is considerably cheaper than the same investment through a superannuation fund, despite the possibility of the reverse being true,” the report said.

“It is issues such as this lack of simple comparability that are of the most concern.

“Given the wide array of product choice available to investors, it is imperative that consumers can make fair and reasonable comparisons which are not unduly complicated.”

 

Super fund disclosure rules inequitable: ISA
ifa logo
promoted stories

SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN

News

Business Strategy