X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Treasury unable to answer key bank levy questions: ABA

The ABA has accused the government of introducing policy with “indecent haste”, noting that Treasury was unable to answer key questions during a meeting with banks yesterday.

by Staff Writer
May 12, 2017
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a statement, ABA chief executive Anna Bligh said the federal government’s new tax on banks is now fraught with even more uncertainty.

She said yesterday’s meeting between Treasury officials and bank representatives was the first time banks were consulted on the new tax.

X

“Not only has the government kept the banks and the public in the dark on this new tax, it is now clear that they have kept Treasury in the dark too,” Ms Bligh said.

The ABA said banks left the meeting with more than 20 unanswered questions.

These included issues such as the basis on which the tax was calculated, how the tax would affect transactions and impact the economy and which of the banks’ commercial activities will be captured by the tax.

“It is even more clear that this is policy on the run, playing fast and loose with the most critical sector of the Australian economy,” Ms Bligh said.

According to Ms Bligh, Treasury officials also confirmed that the government would be abandoning normal processes to prepare the legislation.

The banks only had until midday Monday to make submissions about the new tax, a process that normally takes several weeks.

Further, draft legislation will only be provided to the banks next Wednesday, giving them one day to respond, and will not be released for public consultation, she said.

“Serious questions need to be asked about the indecent haste with which this new bill is being shoehorned into Parliament in a way that will avoid normal drafting and review processes and the scrutiny that should accompany such a critically important piece of legislation,” Ms Bligh said.

“As we said on Tuesday, this is bad public policy concocted on the run as a political tax grab to fill a budget black hole.”

Earlier this week, the banks confirmed that this tax would be passed on to consumers.

Senator Katy Gallagher yesterday called on Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Treasurer Scott Morrison to explain how they will prevent this.

“Banking customers, employees and shareholders should not become the victims of the government’s fiscal incompetence and their inability to rein in the deficit,” she said.

“Whilst Malcolm Turnbull and Scott Morrison like to talk tough on banks, when the rubber hits the road, they simply fold. The big test for Malcolm Turnbull out of this budget is whether he will stand up to the banks and their CEO’s and ensure that the cost of his levy is not simply passed on.”

 

 

 

Related Posts

Image: FAAA

FAAA wants auditors in the spotlight over Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
December 12, 2025
1

Speaking on a Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) webinar on Thursday, chief executive Sarah Abood said she was pleased to...

Expect a 2026 surge in self-licencing: MDS

by Alex Driscoll
December 12, 2025
0

The dominant story of 2025 in the advice world has undoubtably been ASIC’s suing of InterPrac due to the failure...

image: feng/stock.adobe.com

Adviser movement surges as year-end licensee switching accelerates

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
December 12, 2025
0

According to Padua Wealth Data’s latest weekly analysis, there was a net gain of five advisers in the week ending...

Comments 4

  1. Gav says:
    9 years ago

    Do I feel sorry for the banks having to give up 5% of their profits No, since they were all part of the cartel that took away 50% of the earnings of risk advisers. Govt didnt go far enough to make them feel the pain! Maybe Turnbull and Morrison took this knowing the banks were making more profit and not showing any benefit for the consumer…I can dream!

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    9 years ago

    Are the banks really that dumb? They were slow to react to wealth management complaints, they have made it almost impossible for small business to get a loan and they have stuck their noses up at the Government with the appointment of their new spokesperson. What did they expect?

    Reply
  3. Julie Matheson CFP, WA says:
    9 years ago

    Well done Scott Morrison. The bank levy is well overdue. During the GFC the Rudd Govt introduced a taxpayer guarantee on bank deposits. This guarantee had a disastrous effect on other deposit taking funds like mortgage, bonds and income trusts. Many are still frozen or restricted to this date. Other small deposit and lending businesses went to the wall. So it is only fair that the big banks pay for monopolising deposits using a taxpayer guarantee at the expense of others.

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    9 years ago

    Anna Bllgh use to speak on behalf of the people of QLD and now she speaks against the banking victims of Australia

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited