The AIOFP has urged a parliamentary committee to scrutinise direct life insurance sales, arguing these are putting consumers in a “dangerous position”.
In a submission to the life insurance inquiry – to be conducted by the parliamentary joint committee on corporations and financial services – the AIOFP said it believes life insurers are ramping up efforts to directly target consumers and bypass financial advisers in an effort to payout less claims.
“Advisers are a threat to this strategy as they demand the client gets a guarantee of cover up front and acts as their ongoing advocate to protect their position, particularly in times of claim,” the submission states.
“Allowing companies to sell flawed products directly to consumers without being underwritten and guaranteed upfront is an affront to consumer fairness.”
The AIOFP also said there needs to be more clarification around what is considered a lapse of a policy. For instance, the association does not believe the death of a policyholder should be considered a lapse.
“Policies that are terminated due to retirement or becoming obsolete to the consumer’s circumstances should not be considered a lapse,” the AIOFP said.
“The inclusion of these policies in the lapsed category can only serve one objective: to build a negative story against the advisers to justify change in the companies’ favour.”
Further, the AIOFP called for changes so that companies can scrutinised by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).
“Advisers and companies are shareholders of FOS but only advisers are subject to legal process, scrutiny, threats of expulsion and subsequent loss of AFSLs,” the submission states.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 10:02Former Dover and Synchron adviser banned for five yearsBy Eliot Hastie
- 09:37Very few Australians save and even fewer invest their moneyBy Reporter
- 09:49Advisers undercharging clients for efforts, says CEOBy Adrian Flores
- 23 Jan 2019Adelaide adviser permanently banned from industryBy Eliot Hastie
- 23 Jan 2019Bowen slams ‘woeful’ handling of royal commissionBy James Mitchell
- 23 Jan 2019Gender super gap lower but still at 34%By Adrian Flores
- view all