Speaking to the media at the AFA 2016 National Adviser Conference last week, Ms O’Dwyer said she plans to re-introduce LIF on Wednesday or Thursday this week.
When asked if she expects any issues with passing the reforms, she said she believes most people accept it is important to align consumer interests with remuneration structures.
“There have been three separate reports, all of which have included that there needs to be significant change in this area,” Ms O’Dwyer said.
“The government has worked with the industry to deliver a package of reforms that we think work for consumers and ensure the viability of the industry at the same time.
“We don’t want to add to the underinsurance problem in Australia. We want to make sure that people who want access to life insurance products are able to get that access, but we want to make sure there is no conflict in the advice that is being provided at the same time because of how someone is being paid.”
Ms O’Dwyer added that the government is “proceeding with pace” to introduce into Parliament the reforms that will lift education standards for advisers.
“You would be aware that we have had a lot of industry stakeholder consultation before the election. We’re going to proceed with the next round of consultation on those reforms,” she said.
“We’ve got an agreement from the banks to actually fund the government statutory body that will look at all of these professional standards, the ethical framework, the exam and alike.
“The government is looking to actually have that legislation draft into Parliament before too long.”
Who reforms the reformers?
THE MINISTER IS STILL UNABLE TO ARTICULATE ONE BENEFIT FOR CONSUMERS IN THE LIF, IT IS ALL ABOUT PROFITS FOR BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES AT THE EXPENSE OF CONSUMERS.
Wow Ms Odwyer, talk about conflicts of interest. You’ll continue to push LIF bank / FSC promoted reforms to provide more power and profits to the dodgy banks in Life Insurance.
At the same time the banks are going to fund their own professional standards and ethics frame work body.
Spoken like a true NAB executive.
Why are the banks funding the government statutory body ? Conflict of Interest ?