The Life Insurance Customer Group (LICG) believes the reason the FSC is trying to rush LIF legislation through Parliament is so that the legislation can bypass scrutiny by the ACCC.
In a statement, the LICG argued the FSC has opted to hastily force the LIF through Parliament with messy legislation because it did not believe it would survive ACCC scrutiny.
“The FSC has no data on which to justify their position, no rationale behind reducing remuneration to their recommended level, and no one has been able to specify one single benefit to consumers,” the LICG said.
“There is no evidence of ‘churn’. No-one has even defined ‘churn’.
“That would make it difficult to justify to the ACCC.”
The LICG also questions why the FSC has not gone to the ACCC if it believes its own arguments about ‘churning’ and significant consumer benefits and has sufficient evidence to substantiate the claims.
“Had industry gone to the ACCC with a proposition that could provide a better outcome for consumers, despite the negative impact on some industry stakeholders, such reforms could have been implemented a year ago,” the LICG said.
“Consumers deserve to be able to trust that our financial services sector representatives are acting for them and not just for the shareholders of the huge organisations that make up the FSC.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 19 Feb 2019ASIC to ‘fully implement’ Hayne recommendationsBy James Mitchell
- 19 Feb 2019CFS hamstrung advisers as they left for DoverBy Adrian Flores
- 18 Feb 2019ASIC appeals Westpac best interests court decisionBy Adrian Flores
- 18 Feb 2019FASEA mostly funded by the major banksBy Adrian Flores
- 19 Feb 2019Great advisers are going to thrive: Dow JonesBy Eliot Hastie
- 15 Feb 2019ASIC to undertake harsher penalties against banksBy Eliot Hastie
- view all