The Governance Institute of Australia has today launched a policy initiative to investigate whether changes should be made to the corporate regulator's roles and responsibilities to more effectively enable it to safeguard the efficiency and integrity of Australia's financial system.
At a forum held in Sydney this morning, David Murray, chair of the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), ASX chief executive Elmer Funke Kupper and a panel of experts from the corporate, consumer, investor and legal sectors debated the question 'What kind of corporate regulator does Australia need?'.
"This is an important conversation in the wake of questions that were raised about ASIC's performance, funding and powers by the recent Senate and Financial System inquiries," said the chief executive of the Governance Institute, Tim Sheehy.
"There are strong community expectations for ASIC to be more effective at cracking down on corporate wrongdoing."
At the same time, it is generally acknowledged that the regulator's responsibilities have expanded far beyond its original focus. Yet while ASIC's responsibilities today extend beyond regulating entities in the financial system to consumer credit and markets surveillance, deep budget cuts over the years have diminished ASIC's capacity to meet public expectations.
"We are now at a crossroads," Mr Sheehy said. "While the FSI has recommended changes to funding, have the expanded responsibilities diluted ASIC's capacity to meet its charter? If the integrity of our markets and financial system relies on a strong and fearless regulator, we as stakeholders have an interest in ensuring that ASIC maintains its credibility as an effective watchdog."
Mr Sheehy noted that there are many changes ahead for ASIC.
"The registry business is about to be privatised, a three-year funding model is on the agenda, supported by a 'user-pays' regime, and the government has just opened a review of its current capabilities," Mr Sheehy said.
"[The] Governance Institute's initiative complements these reforms by focusing on what ASIC's core responsibilities should be in our 21st century economy.
"What should ASIC's priorities be? How does ASIC best address the expectation gap between its duties and powers and the community's expectations? And what changes are needed to make ASIC a more proactive regulator? These are issues that are ripe for consideration if ASIC is to fulfil its role in an increasingly complex financial system", Mr Sheehy concluded.
The Governance Institute of Australia is the only independent professional association whose sole focus is the practice of governance.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 10:20Beacon advisers now ‘ransom’ while IIOF money remains missingBy James Mitchell
- 19 Sep 2018Linchpin funded advice business in liquidationBy James Mitchell
- 19 Sep 2018McMaster: Where was ASIC on Beacon, CBA and AMP?By James Mitchell
- 18 Sep 2018Peter Kell resigns as deputy chair of ASICBy Eliot Hastie
- 18 Sep 2018Two former Macquarie advisers given 10-year banBy Adrian Flores
- 19 Sep 2018Raiz addresses Millennial advice gap with chatbotBy Reporter
- view all