X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Labor union ties underlie FOFA agenda

The opposition’s FOFA disallowance motion is a case of Labor prioritising trade union and industry fund interests over those of small businesspeople, a Coalition senator has argued.

by Stefanie Garber
November 20, 2014
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Addressing the Senate in dissent of the motion, Victorian senator Michael Ronaldson accused the Labor party, and in particular Senator Sam Dastyari, of “duplicity”.

“It is crocodile tears for those who should be protected and it is only about the cheap motives of the Australian Labor Party,” he said in reference to Senator Dastyari’s support of the motion.

X

He suggested the ALP disenfranchised small business owners in favour of union interests.

“It is quite obvious to me that the Australian Labor Party hates the small business sector,” he said.

“They always have because the small business sector does not support the Labor Party’s philosophical views, which is about big unions and big businesses.”

Senator Ronaldson said if the ALP won in next week’s Victorian election, it would be in debt to the CMFEU.

“The dirty deeds have been done but it hasn’t been dirt cheap,” he said.  “There have been tens and tens and tens of thousands of union money going into the Australian Labor Party.”

He predicted crossbenchers who supported Labor in yesterday’s vote would have to answer to their electorate.

“How are you going to look them in the eye tomorrow and say, ‘I had the opportunity to discuss this matter till Thursday of next week and I decided I was not prepared to do so? Instead, I decided to back the Australian Labor Party because of their complete and utter ownership by the trade union movement,’” he said.

Related Posts

Top 5 ifa stories of 2025

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
0

Here are the top five stories of 2025.   ASIC turns up heat on Venture Egg boss over $1.2bn fund collapse...

Image: Nathan Fradley

Regulatory ‘limbo’ set to continue in 2026, but positives remain

by Keith Ford
December 23, 2025
0

Wrapping up 2025 and looking forward to the next 12 months, Nathan Fradley from Fradley Advice explained why he’s positive...

First Guardian fallout continues for Diversa with APRA action

by Adrian Suljanovic
December 23, 2025
0

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has imposed new licence conditions on Diversa Trustees to address concerns about its investment...

Comments 7

  1. Funky Goose says:
    11 years ago

    Pavel I am a corporate authorised rep of a subsidiary of a bank and pay them an annual fee. I run everything in my business from employing staff to finding premises etc – and bear the business risk – what do you mean I am not a small business ? Clearly you have no idea.

    Reply
  2. CFP18 says:
    11 years ago

    If the Lib’s have any sense they will mandate that all financial service sectors have the same rules.

    Also disallowing the Unions from fund ownership and control (how the F did they ever become allowed into it in the first place? Keating era of course).

    To do so? Simply act on the Union corruption reports flowing thick & fast…

    Reply
  3. Pavel says:
    11 years ago

    Come off it dear Senator. Over 80% of financial planners are owned or substantially economically owned or linked to banks and wealth companies – none which can be classed as small business.

    So get over it. Your mean and tricky Stealth by Regs ploy failed and Australians are the better for it.

    Reply
  4. Lampooned says:
    11 years ago

    Forget vertical integration conflicts between product and advice by the big 4. We have the ultimate vertical integration here from policy to product… Super fees are generated by Industry Super Funds….which are owned by Trade Unions…which fund the Labour party…who influence policy. What hope has the average suburban financial planner trying to help his clients got?

    Reply
  5. Retiring ! says:
    11 years ago

    And the winner is Industry Super (IS)

    That’s me gone after 25 years and three finance degrees

    No rule of law in Australia

    No property rights

    No prospect of building a business safely that IS can annex at any time using a couple of illiterate muppets

    Reply
  6. Funky Goose says:
    11 years ago

    FOFA does not afford any protection for customers that deal directly with Industry Super Funds nor their influence through misleading advertising and PR.

    Reply
  7. Ross Cardillo says:
    11 years ago

    FoFA must apply to all and sundry – meaning all industry Superannuation Funds as well.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited