There needs to be clarification between trustees and advisers over whose responsibility it is to manage compliance inside SMSFS, says a compliance consultant.
In a statement, Australian Superannuation and Compliance (ASC) said the current situation regarding managing responsibility for compliance inside SMSFs is a “fuzzy area” since both advisers and trustees point at each other to claim responsibility.
“The trustee maintains it is the role of the adviser whilst the adviser believes it’s the function of the trustee,” ASC founder and director Ravi Subramaniam said.
“With hefty ATO tax penalties of up to 47 per cent plus the Medicare levy on the total value of the SMSF, it is an immensely important area that demands clarity and certainty for investors,” he said.
Mr Subramaniam said the current “stalemate” between advisers and trustees over managing SMSF compliance means the problem ends up with the administrator.
“Currently there is no requirement to disclose who is responsible for the SMSF compliance as ultimately it all falls into the lap of the trustees as per the regulations,” Mr Subramaniam said.
“But herein is the problem: Each SMSF trustee is different and there is no consistency in whom they use as their service providers, i.e. investment adviser, financial planner, accountant or administrator,” he said.
“SMSF administration and compliance is an area that demands many years of experience in order to provide this service and facility competently,” Mr Subramaniam added.
Leaders in financial services have the opportunity to widen their moats against upstart competitors. ...
The advice industry is currently in a budding phase but will “bloom in the next three to five years”, according to a new white paper. ...
ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based adviser from providing financial services and performing any function in a financial services business for six years...