X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Union slams advice education moves

A 400,000-member-strong trade union has accused financial institutions of raising adviser education standards just to appease “public sentiment”.

by Staff Writer
September 9, 2014
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a submission to the parliamentary inquiry into advice standards, the Finance Sector Union questioned the motives behind announcements of higher minimum adviser standards by institutions such as AMP, CBA and NAB.

“While the move by some Licensees to self-impose higher education standards is a step towards having a better educated system, it would appear at a surface view these changes have been brought about to address the current public sentiment, in particular the distrust of financial planning, [rather] than to do with any genuine attempt by licensees to better the integrity and transparency of the industry,” the FSU’s submission argued, adding that RG146 can still be “achieved in under a week”.

X

The submission said that while efforts to increase education standards may result in a “positive outcome for many consumers” it adds that there is “still the gap that an increased education standard would not address”: conflicted remuneration.

The FSU calls for “delinking the planner/organisation from the financial benefits associated with ‘specific’ product sales”, arguing that the structural separation of product and advice cannot be achieved by higher education standards.

At the same time, however, the union recommends that the government raise education standards in the financial planning industry to a degree minimum as well as calling for the introduction of a national examination.

The FSU also backed the government’s proposal of an adviser register and the concept of a “national uniform code of conduct” for the industry.

Related Posts

Image:

‘Volatile’ end of year for adviser numbers sees 223 exit

by Keith Ford
January 9, 2026
0

According to the latest Padua Wealth Data numbers, the period between 18 December 2025 and 8 January 2026 was a...

AFCA

Shield, First Guardian continue to dominate AFCA complaints

by Keith Ford
January 9, 2026
0

In its latest update to its Datacube, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has revealed that from 1 July 2025...

Property dominates the thoughts of aspirational investors

by Alex Driscoll
January 9, 2026
0

According to CFS research, one in five Australians say that if they could invest, they would choose property, with many still expecting returns...

Comments 13

  1. Kenneth Stephens says:
    11 years ago

    Let’s also “delink” the payment of life insurancer commissions to the unions for the industry funds and give members of those funds some choice outside of union directed/enforced options (or rather lack thereof).

    Reply
  2. Steve says:
    11 years ago

    Don’t forget the FPA flogs more courses.
    Online rubbish of course but as long as they get paid, that’s all that counts right FPA……problem solved.

    Reply
  3. Phil says:
    11 years ago

    As usual the unions convieniently ignore the facts. Most union Super trustees have less than RG146. If anything at all they have just the super subject. And they supposedly look after billions.
    People in glass houses……

    Reply
  4. Joe says:
    11 years ago

    Moron. Like the false ‘compare the pair’ ads weren’t all about public sentiment? What an idiot.

    Delinking needs to start at the base level – the ISA funds themselves. Remove the union movement from superannuation involvement (how did a bunch of wharfie thugs get their hands on Australia’s retirement wealth in the first place? That’s right we can thank Hawk & Keating Labor Gov’s for that!) and hand it over to truly independent trustees and administrators who can run it as a real not for profit group…

    Reply
  5. Andrew Dudman says:
    11 years ago

    The Unions are again misrepresenting the facts. Asic will not issue a License to someone who has nothing but an RG146 accreditation and as Damian says no AFSL will grant an AR on this certificate alone. RG146 is the basic qualification for applying for an admin, para-planning or call centre job in the financial services industry, including industry funds. I, for one, can attest to the requirements the industry imposes and all the checks and balances which must be met.

    The FSU knows better, as many of its staff require this certification. The employment, wages and conditions enjoyed by its members are as a result of the success of the organisations they seek to diminish.

    Unfortunately even The Australian, in a weekend article has bought into this wacky line of thinking about our industry. A Cert 111 in accounting or justice doesn’t allow me to set up an accounting or legal practice and neither does RG146 allow me to set up as a Financial Planner.

    Reply
  6. wondering says:
    11 years ago

    What buffoonery, being accused of increasing education standards just to appease public sentiment yet at the end of the article stipulates that education standards need to be increased. What a typical union buffoon.
    When it comes time to increase controls over unions to stop mismanagement waste and bullying within the union movement, to bring the union management under control and to make them accountable, they all get ansie and protest, go on strike and cause as much disruption & inconvenience as possible. Yet we allow them to comment on important financial matters. A joke. Why would anyone take them seriously.

    Reply
  7. David Bloomfield says:
    11 years ago

    More Accountants in jail than Advisers but it takes 3 yrs to become an accountant and 14 days to be an adviser.

    Smoke and mirrors by the big firms to bluff consumers and a chance for the ex painter to get a tag along his name as an adviser but none of this will wont change the fact that bad advice will be around regardless of this con.

    Advisers should be FREE for the product providers and Planners should be LINKED to the product providers so the consumer knows exactly who they are seeing.

    The FGS for ABZ Wealth hides the fact they they are owned by Product Provider B, if you get my drift

    Reply
  8. Barry PRESTON says:
    11 years ago

    It seems to me that tne more educated we become the more complex information transfer becomes to the point where many struggle to understand what they are doing. Seems to me there are too many products, with simple names like ‘ Capital Guaranteed’ is it guaranteed -by whom?. Maybe a degree in C.S. would be a wonderful addition to the world of Finance. Then C.S. is not a taught subject at Uni……(C.S. Common Sence). Its a great way to start a paragraph to a story. A 400,000-member strong trade union…… I just wonder how many of the 400k strong are aware of the ‘Union has accused….’

    Reply
  9. anti V-I says:
    11 years ago

    I wouldn’t say none Damian

    Reply
  10. Damian says:
    11 years ago

    You may get an RG146 certificate in a week, but what Dealer Group would allow a cowboy to set up a business with no experience. NONE.

    Reply
  11. John G says:
    11 years ago

    I don’t give a hang what standard/ exam result etc is required to be an Adviser so long as it NEVER becomes compulsory for individuals or SMSF trustees to have one.

    Reply
  12. Lee Virgin says:
    11 years ago

    To the FSU Spokesperson – you wouldn’t be worried about how your advisers would get on if they had to have similar minimum education standards by any chance?

    Reply
  13. Edward says:
    11 years ago

    I would like to see what “self-imposed” level of minimum education standards the FSU have/propose for their own financial planners and whether they have “de-linked” their financial planners to their own industry super products? Of course not, that wouldn’t suit them it’s a whole lot easier to point the finger at everyone else!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited