Accounting body CPA Australia has thrown its weight behind proposals to more clearly delineate differences between independent and product provider-aligned advisers.
In its response to the FSI interim report, the association argued there is a “need to clearly distinguish between independent and aligned advisers”, following David Murray’s request for consultation on the question and ASIC’s endorsement of such a move last week.
“Vertical integration consistently raises issues around conflicts of interest, through restricted approved product lists and the perceived or real bias towards in-house products,” the submission states.
“The combination of separating the advice and product, as well as creating a distinction between aligned and non-aligned advice, [would lead to] one of the key objectives of a well-functioning market – transparency – [being] created.”
The submission suggests the business model of vertical integration has resulted in a general perception by consumers that advisers are “product floggers”, which has reflected negatively on the entire financial services industry.
At the same time, the submission concedes “there will be challenges in ensuring a model can be created that is clear and meaningful to the consumer”, but adds that it is a goal that “can be achieved”.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 16 Nov 2018Government sets $51m to pursue misconductBy Eliot Hastie
- 16 Nov 2018The financial advisers most people don’t read aboutBy James Mitchell
- 16 Nov 2018Clients expect advisers to understand their situationBy Eliot Hastie
- 16 Nov 2018Retirees hit hardest by franking credit changes, says FSCBy Sarah Simpkins
- 16 Nov 2018Trust in advice more important than everBy Stephanie Aikins
- 15 Nov 2018We’ll lose advisers through FASEA but it’s necessaryBy Adrian Flores
- view all