One of the few remaining professional indemnity insurance providers to the financial planning market has called it quits, claiming the risks have become too great.
“Vero previously ceased offering cover to new business customers in this segment and has now ceased offering renewals, effective 18 August 2014.
“Vero’s market share has significantly declined over the last two years. There has been increasing capacity in the market over the past 12 months and currently there are a number of insurers offering professional indemnity cover for financial planners.”
However, Vero client and boutique advice firm principal Michael Pinn told ifa that he has not witnessed an “increasing capacity” in suppliers to financial planning businesses.
“Personally, I am disappointed that Vero are exiting and we are denied the opportunity to underwrite with an Australia-based underwriter after this year,” Mr Pinn said.
“Given the [Tax Agent Services Act] legislation, and comments to the effect that providing financial planners with PI cover for tax advice would not be a problem, you are left wondering.”
Mr Pinn suggested that the exit of Vero may be an appropriate time to rethink the compulsory PI regime for advice businesses.
“It has been promoted by a segment of the industry for some time that compulsory PI insurance has contributed to the problem and that not having PI insurance is not necessarily a bad thing,” he said.
“As underwriters exit the market there may be no option but to review the requirement for compulsory PI insurance.”
Should PI insurance be compulsory for advisers? Have your say below.
CountPlus firm AdviceCo has completed a tuck-in acquisition of Arch Capital, abs...
Banking and finance has been named as one of the sectors with the highest monthl...
EXCLUSIVE: Collapsed licensee Dover Financial is suing a number of former autho...