ASIC deputy chair Peter Kell has spoken candidly about the corporate regulator’s focus on disclosure, inability to weed out conflicts of interest and the impact on advisers.
Speaking at the Centre for International Finance and Regulation conference in Sydney last week, Mr Kell said ASIC’s approach over the past 15 years has been “anything goes as long as you disclose”.
“The role of disclosure is an underlying principle in structuring your regulatory requirements and regimes,” Mr Kell said.
“That was central to the Wallis Inquiry regulatory philosophy and is central to ASIC’s powers,” he said.
“The approach we have had over the last 15 years has been ‘anything goes as long as you disclose’, that you can issue any sort of product out there - which has certainly enabled a wide range of choice - as long as you disclose, and you can have any sort of remuneration structure with conflicts of interest imbedded in it, as long as you disclose.”
While he admits this is “not a nuanced version” of ASIC’s duties, Mr Kell said it does “capture our approach.”
“One of the lessons we have had since then is that approach puts too much weight on disclosure to address market problems,” he said.
“We have had a situation where too often disclosure has been the answer but we have forgotten the question.”
Disclosure remains central to the regulatory philosophy that underpins ASIC’s powers, Mr Kell said; however, the regulator is increasingly looking at areas where disclosure does not address market issues, he added
“We are looking into areas where disclosure is not addressing the market failure, not improving market outcomes, but all it is doing is imposing costs on those that have to produce the disclosure documents,” he said.
APRA-regulated super funds could create better member outcomes by taking the sam...
Australian high-net-worth investors lost more money than their global counterpar...
The negative impact of COVID-related market volatility on clients’ super inves...