Authorised representatives of licensees could be personally liable for Best Interests Duty breaches post-FOFA and should seek other contractual arrangements, a financial services lawyer has warned.
Charmian Holmes, solicitor director at The Fold Legal, says being an authorised representative in the new regulatory environment poses additional risks, and that advisers should ask their licensee to let them provide advice as an employee only.
After the FOFA (Future of Financial Advice) reforms implementation date of July 1, authorised representatives (ARs) may face fines of up to $200,000 for serious breaches of the Best Interests Duty, while salaried advisers will enjoy the protection of their licensee.
“There is actually no legal requirement for employed advisers to be appointed as ARs,” Ms Holmes said. “They can provide financial services under their employer’s AFS licence without it; if an employed adviser is not an AR, these fines won’t apply to them.”
The lawyer warned that under an AR arrangement, the individual adviser will have to deal with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission themselves in the event of allegations of non-compliance, and could potentially even face the prospect of bankruptcy in some cases.
“Professional indemnity insurance doesn’t cover these fines so, my advice to them is to ask their licensee to terminate their appointment as an authorised representative right now,” she said.
For an extended version of these comments see the upcoming ifa magazine.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE IFA DAILY BULLETIN
- 16 Nov 2018Government sets $51m to pursue misconductBy Eliot Hastie
- 16 Nov 2018The financial advisers most people don’t read aboutBy James Mitchell
- 16 Nov 2018Clients expect advisers to understand their situationBy Eliot Hastie
- 16 Nov 2018Retirees hit hardest by franking credit changes, says FSCBy Sarah Simpkins
- 16 Nov 2018Trust in advice more important than everBy Stephanie Aikins
- 15 Nov 2018We’ll lose advisers through FASEA but it’s necessaryBy Adrian Flores
- view all