Best Interests Duty clarity needed: AFA
As the Future of Financial Advice implementation date looms, much is still unclear about the amendment’s Best Interests Duty requirement, says the Association of Financial Advisers.
Speaking to ifa, AFA chief executive Brad Fox said advisers need to know the full practical implications of the Best Interests Duty (BID) requirement within the FOFA amendment to the Corporations Act.
“Our concern around the best interests duty is the final clause and in particular the ‘and anything that may be relevant’ catch-all phrase,” Fox said.
“It’s hard to know how far-reaching that last clause is, we’d like to have more clarity on what may or may not be included,” he added.
Unless there is further guidance provided from the regulator, lessons will be learned the “hard way” through disputes before the Financial Ombudsman, Fox said.
“For most advisers this shouldn’t be a major concern because most advisers have operated under the best interest duty since they began,” Fox said. “But for those though that operate around the edges, they will need to come back into the middle.”
Other regulatory issues requiring further clarity include the Tax Agents Services Act and new requirements surrounding personal tax advice, as well as the full details on grandfathering.
“We continue to work with Treasury and ASIC about making the regulations liveable,” he said. “They’ve been collaborative.”
Regulators lose again to major institutions
The prudential regulator has been unsuccessful in its attempt to take legal acti...
Sunsuper names new CEO
Industry fund Sunsuper has appointed a new chief executive to lead the fund thr...
Aussie investment banking revenue plunged 27.9%
Activities in Australian investment banking generated US$1.4 billion in the firs...