X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

AIOFP claims ‘senior’ politicians are contacting its members ahead of election

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) has claimed that some of its members are reporting to have been contacted by Coalition politicians ahead of the federal election.

by Neil Griffiths
January 31, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The AIOFP told ifa that senior politicians are “actively wanting to make contact with groups of advisers seeking their views on the current legislation in café style meetings”.

It comes just weeks after the association launched its “engage and enrage” campaign that called on financial advisers across Australia to put aside political differences in a bid to unite and incite change within the sector.

X

AIOFP executive director Peter Johnston said the advice industry has a “platinum opportunity” to seek further changes by government within the sector over the next two months.

“Having the finance and foreign affairs ministers wanting to meet with groups of advisers in café settings is evidence of their desperation to win the traditionally voting Advice community back to support them,” Mr Johnston told ifa.

“Unless it is Treasurer Frydenberg and his chief adviser Martin Codina promising change, it will be a waste of time.

“They have had six years to assist us and now they are looking doubtful in the polls, they are on their knees begging for support.”

The news comes after The Advisers Association (TAA) chief executive Neil Macdonald said the advice sector has reason to be “optimistic” ahead of the election.

“I’m optimistic, particularly because I think there is a recognition on both sides of the government that there needs to be changes, and the pendulum’s probably swung a little bit too far,” he said during a recent episode of the ifa Show.

“I think they’re looking for the associations and advisers to give them some constructive feedback on what needs to change and how.”

Listen to the full podcast with Mr Macdonald here.

Related Posts

Image: Wisut/stock.adobe.com

Shield liquidators set to deliver distribution to investors

by Keith Ford
December 3, 2025
3

In a letter to unitholders of the Shield Master Fund, Jason Tracy of Alvarez & Marsal said that he and...

Cyber security concerns biggest obstacle to AI integration

by Alex Driscoll
December 3, 2025
0

Conversations in the advice landscape are dominated by the impact AI. Inescapable at this point, part of this conversation is,...

Intelliflo unveils AI integration partnership

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
December 3, 2025
0

Faybl is an end-to-end digital tool specifically designed for financial advisers and wealth managers, utilising AI to assist wealth professionals...

Comments 27

  1. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    The pillow has been well and truly been put over the advice industries head with over compliance – dying a slow death… shame.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    I hope the Liberals lose the election by 15,000 votes…equivalent to the number of remaining advisers…….at the moment!!!

    Reply
  3. LNP member says:
    4 years ago

    As someone who is/has been a member and helped out a lot in the party, I would not be surprised if the continued trend of LNP members going over to the Liberal Democrats will increase. I just don’t see how anyone who normally votes for LNP can just so easily shift their vote to Labor, when other better options are available.

    Reply
  4. Who's drinking the Kool-Aid? says:
    4 years ago

    Seriously, does anyone really believe that politicians care what financial planners think? I doubt very much that any politicians (Coalition or Labor) are looking to get the view of any suburban financial planners. I love your passion @PeterJohnston but I highly doubt that the Coalition is seeking out AIOFP members for consultation (or FPA or AFA members either for that matter).

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    We have been accused of self interest in the rejection or opposition to some of the worst regulation ever seen and now desperate
    politicians seeking to save their own skin are doing nothing other than pushing for their own self interest and their jobs.
    Disgusting.
    They are not genuinely interested in our position at all….they are only interested in votes and retaining power…as they have categorically abused over the last decade in relation to financial services and advisers.

    Reply
  6. See you later says:
    4 years ago

    I think Frydenberg, Hume and their Liberal mates are cooked! Hate to be the bearer of bad news but they won’t make any meaningful changes for the advice community in their short time left in office because they have acted upon other agendas…

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      More like FriedEggBerg…fully cooked!!!!

      Reply
  7. Former Coalition voter says:
    4 years ago

    Too little, too late. Unless the Coalition come up with some kind of ‘shock and awe’ type policies, which dramatically change our fortunes, they are stuffed. Not only are huge numbers of advisers preparing to vote Labor (some for the first time in their lives), many of us have been soiling our client bases with anti-coalition messages. It’s a powerful message as our clients know full well we normally advocate for the Coalition. So they sit up straight when we say otherwise. Especially when that message is delivered to clients with ridiculous multiple/lengthy fee agreements and fee increases.

    Reply
  8. Anon says:
    4 years ago

    Unfortunately financial advice is pretty low down the list of problems this Government are facing.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Correct. And as Peter Johnston should know, Craig Kelly has been contacting everybody he can and has been for a while (by text).

      Reply
  9. Experienced says:
    4 years ago

    Josh Frydenberg does not care at all regarding Financial Advisers…he never has done.
    The Liberal Party has done everything in its power to dismantle advisers businesses and destroy the small business model.
    Now they are staring at an election loss they will start to try and claw back years of negligence and death by regulation in order to save their own political skins.
    I have voted Liberal my whole life and I’m 58.
    They do not deserve my vote and I will vote for Labor just to get rid of them despite my despise for the Labor/Union accord and the conflicted relationships with Industry Super.
    I simply don’t care.
    The Liberals are like a bad partner who has cheated on you multiple times and still wants you to forgive them…….no more.
    The Liberals cannot be trusted at all as they have shown nothing but disdain for this industry.
    They are an absolute disgrace.

    Reply
  10. Swing that pendulum hard says:
    4 years ago

    Love all this government has done to force change on the industry that would not have otherwise. I’ll be more upset if they make concessions for non-degree qualified advisers. Those seeing the pendulum swinging too far are the ones who need to leave. It’ll now swing back into a sweet spot for all those left. Great opportunity for the professionals…

    Reply
  11. Anonymous says:
    4 years ago

    The coalition will never get my vote ever again

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      why? if you’re looking to blame I would suggest the Government is well down the list.

      Reply
  12. Sue says:
    4 years ago

    I’m in Josh Frydenberg’s electorate. I’ve emailed him several times with my concerns. No response. The final email I sent I told him I would not be voting for him. Still no response. What difference does a cafe make??

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      …around $5,000 to $10,000 from you in terms of the funds he needs to retain his seat…The only reason for the ‘sit down’ is to get something FROM YOU not to do anything FOR YOU.

      Reply
    • Anon says:
      4 years ago

      He was probably at the tennis.

      Reply
  13. Michelle says:
    4 years ago

    too much common sense there James22. It’s the public servants in Treasury and ASIC that matter, and they consider financial planners to be like a fart in an elevator and middle to high ranking public servants can’t be sacked. ASIC has pretty much stated they want Advisers eliminated and we’ve seen Treasury view on Advisers being expressed in their review of FoFA. It’s a reason you can’t take the softly softly FPA approach you need to go to war on Politicians so the message gets sent to Treasury loud and clear.

    Reply
  14. James22 says:
    4 years ago

    Its great politicians are more open to listening in lead up to election. Experience pathways and commissions are not going to get us all on the same page. Removal of redtape where advice is unconflicted and a reduction in costs to practice may just win our votes. Level playing field across intrafund, accountants and licensed advisers….no carve outs for the less qualified or invested advisers? That might help too. Why cant fully qualified advisers provide intrafund advice on same terms? Give the most qualified professionals the least redtape instead of the most……Don’t continue to have us subsidise the broader industry and exited banks. Tax deduction on all fees, makes a lot of sense. Separate license for risk professionals…. yes, still will require study though but why not allow lifie’s to receive commission. Even let them implement the advice provided by fully licensed advisers for commission where it suits. Some responsibility back on investors, a notional cost to clients who want to proceed at FOS after getting a stage 1 knock back…..And those damn fee forms…… seriously, a one page invoice to clients each year with an option to tick a box to to pay via product if preferred will do the trick. Get rid of all the prescriptive impractical expensive guff that client never ever read…..

    Reply
  15. Wonder Dog says:
    4 years ago

    Well they don’t respond to correspondence. I have voted Liberal all my working life. No more, Labor will be worse despite what noises they make. I will be voting Lib Dems or informal. I have all but given upon the political process and trust none of them.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Me Too

      Reply
    • ex-Liberal says:
      4 years ago

      From history, Labor is clearly better for financial services than Liberal. The Liberals have no control over ASIC and APRA; who in turn are allowed to run riot with their socialist agendas.

      Reply
  16. Jack Russell says:
    4 years ago

    Today’s Newspoll will probably spur the whole cabinet to engage with the industry. Too late – the damage is done and no politician can be trusted.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      The Pendulum has swung so far its doing loop the loops.
      This disgusting LNP rabble & especially Frydenberg must be shown the door.
      FRYDENBERG MUST GO NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Reply
      • Anonymous says:
        4 years ago

        You would rather labor be in charged? Be a dogs breakfast at best.

        Reply
  17. Anon says:
    4 years ago

    “Having the finance and foreign affairs ministers wanting to meet with groups of advisers in café settings is evidence of their desperation to win the traditionally voting Advice community back to support them,” Mr Johnston told ifa.

    No, this is standard operating procedure leading up to an election. They all do it. I had lunch with a NSW Minister on the weekend along with a candidate in the local bye-election.

    Reply
    • Has shoes says:
      4 years ago

      Correct they all do it, and usually it comes with a price rage if $5000 – $10,000 to have a sit down lunch for you and a few clients…all in the name of raising funds to compete in the elections…

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited