Up to 30 per cent of risk-focused advisers are expected to sell their practice and retire in the next few years, driven by the convergence of four major factors:
- Demographic changes;
- Technology and digital disruption;
- Changes to adviser remuneration under the Life Insurance Framework; and
- Stricter education and training requirements.
Much of this isn’t new. It bears the hallmarks of 2004 when the introduction of new standards under the Financial Services Reform Act (FRSA) saw hundreds of older advisers exit the industry.
An entire generation of invaluable knowledge and experience was lost. As a result, the industry lost its emotional connection with many clients.
Moving into 2017 and looking to 2018 and beyond, it’s important that there isn’t a repeat of 2004.
While FSRA admittedly drove out many unqualified and poorly qualified agents, many competent, hardworking mature advisers were caught up in the confusion. There was little support for those who wanted to upskill and stick around but didn’t know how to adapt and manage the transition. Similarly, little was done to give retiring principals a proper send-off that recognised their contribution to the industry.
This generation of resilient pioneers who had built successful businesses and raised awareness of the value of insurance were cast aside and forgotten.
Their client books were gobbled up by the institutions, divvied up and sold.
But the insurance advice industry has an opportunity to get it right this time.
It has another chance to hold on to mature advisers who still want to learn and help clients. Licensees and professional bodies have a critical role to play in providing the education, training and support necessary to help advisers adapt their business models and meet their obligations.
For those in, or nearing, their 60s, who plan to retire soon, the industry must find creative ways to retain their knowledge and expertise.
That may include formal and informal mentoring programs that marry experienced advisers with newcomers.
The client relationship manager
Another practical solution could be for practices, licensees and product manufacturers to create new roles for senior advisers or former advisers with flexible working hours and conditions.
This newly-created position, let’s call it “relationship manager”, would allow advisers to ease into retirement while staying actively involved in the industry and continuing to give back.
A relationship manager’s client-facing responsibilities could include welcoming new and prospective clients, articulating a practice’s value proposition and connecting them to an adviser. Behind the scenes, they could focus on developing and managing referral relationships with centres of influence.
If the industry can successfully close the generation knowledge gap, the result will be a profession that’s not only more educated and technically proficient but also empathetic, passionate and brilliant at articulating the value of wealth protection.
It will retain the art of winning new clients and building personal relationships not only business relationships. (There’s still enormous room for improvement in this area.)
What about me?
Mature advisers approaching retirement must start formalising and implementing their succession plans, if they haven’t already. Being well-prepared will help them to attract the right buyer at the right price on their terms, which may include a transition period to ensure the smooth handover of clients and retention of key staff. This approach would also allow retiring principals to coach and mentor new staff.
Advisers who are focused on growth will soon see a strong supply of practices hit the market. There’ll be some good buys but there’ll be some minefields too, which is why it’s wise to seek independent advice or ask their licensee to help them identify quality practices, negotiate price and terms and potentially secure financing.
To extract the maximum value, it’s imperative that buyers and sellers find a strong cultural fit and work closely together to manage the transition.
Risk insurance practices continue to command around three times recurring revenue, compared to around 2.7-2.8 times for holistic advice practices.
Given premiums are commonly paid from superannuation, risk is extremely sticky and attractive.
Finally, new entrants to financial planning have a unique opportunity to build a compliant, sustainable and relevant fee-based business model on a solid regulatory foundation.
Under the proposed remuneration changes, which will effectively halve upfront commissions and subsequently practice revenue, it’s unlikely that new entrants will specialise in risk and wealth protection.
Instead they’ll need to provide advice on a broad range of matters including superannuation, investments and insurance, and non-traditional advice areas like cashflow management, retirement planning, estate planning and aged care.
This will allow them to build a diversified revenue stream that isn’t heavily dependent on upfront commissions.
While the introduction of LIF may see adviser numbers initially shrink, like in 2004, it won’t be long before they start to rise again. After a period of consolidation and adjustment, people will flow back into the industry. They’ll be drawn by the appeal of compulsory super, the enormous need and demand for professional advice, the chance to run their own business in a dynamic and interesting industry, and the opportunity to make a real difference in people’s lives.
The thing for advisers to remember in this disruptive season is that the businesses that emerged from the mid-00s in a strong position, were those that accepted change, maintained a positive dialogue and relationship with clients, continuously looked for opportunities to grow and grabbed them when they arose.
Christopher Blaxland-Walker is the general manager of distribution at ClearView. This is an excerpt from a recently released ClearView white paper, ‘What’s old is new again’.




“While the introduction of LIF may see adviser numbers initially shrink, like in 2004, it won’t be long before they start to rise again. After a period of consolidation and adjustment, people will flow back into the industry.”
What garbage! written by another overpaid exec who thinks the LIF will increase profits but it will be business as usual.
A 60% commission with a 2 year clawback means you can’t get into the industry and make any money so why would advisers “flow back into the industry”
What an idiot !!
Brian, when I first read the article I thought, “yes I can relate to that” but after a second reading, well…. “Once upon a time…” I have read the whitepaper, and it basically does not tell you an awful lot, except to regurgitate what was said 10 years ago.
It has touched upon the “slight effect” of digital advice, DO NOT bury your head in the sand, this will have an enormous effect in the next few years, not just on risk product advice but on strategic FP advice also, hey if a computer can beat Kasparov at chess, I think it can work out strategic FP advice.
Good luck for new entrants in this new industry battling with this…
Yes people will need the human touch, but over time that will decline, millennials do not need humans, they need the most up to date mobile device for their needs, personal and financial, and this is what, and they are, turning to.
So, I think the article was in fact a waste, no real insight and, I feel, a purely corporate viewpoint but thank you for the effort taken to “cut and paste” this.
Brian , you have nailed it. New entrants will not be entering this industry unless they have a big trail book handed to them. It’s going to be a tough way to earn a livin for us all with all the workload and compliance and education and little upfront reward that tags along with the workload.theres no point flogging a dead horse and going over it all again as you say , the change has happened. Soft leadership in this industry from what I see. With banks largely controlling the industry it doesn’t surprise where the vested interests are.
Lovely article ticking all the right boxes for the politically correct reader who wants to read fairytales.. This is very different to 2004. Biggest thing back then was the new SoA’s. Doesn’t compare now Chris – how on God’s green earth can you say it does in any way shape of form. They are cutting commissions in half fer-chrisssaaaaakes Chris! Risk advisers cannot charge fees – in isolation without an FP base it simply does not work. Please don’t say it does as it becomes tedious. It does not and has been proven by many studies and advisers in the field. The large influx you see happening after the dust settles, well, I’d love to know how an industry (if there’s one left) with low pay and high entry standards and hoops will attract any new entrants at all. This article, unfortunately, is yet another from the corporates who have a vested interest in keeping the industry going at all costs. Shame they weren’t a little more active before the changes came in removing churners. we may not have these issues now. Much more to say on this but it has all been said before and didn’t help advisers then either. Won’t now. Too sad . . .