X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

UK conflicted rem ban fails

The UK’s FOFA-like Retail Distribution Review reforms have not prevented product incentive payments being paid to financial advisers, according to a review conducted by the British authorities.

by Staff Writer
January 20, 2014
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Friday, the UK Financial Conduct Authority – a corporate regulatory authority with similar powers to ASIC – revealed that inducement payments between financial product manufacturers and advisers were still rife, despite the RDR’s ban on conflicted remuneration.

As the UK approaches the one-year anniversary of the RDR’s introduction, the corporate regulator has been forced to provide additional guidance to assist product providers and advisers to manage their conflicts of interest.

X

The guidance follows research conducted by the FCA which found that, despite the explicit ban on conflicted remuneration in the RDR regulations, “some payments by product providers to advisory firms appeared to be linked to securing sales of their products”.

In addition, the review uncovered “financial arrangements” between product providers and advice firms that “potentially incentivised…to promote a specific provider’s product to their advisers”.

“The rules on inducements and conflicts of interest are not new,” said FCA director of supervision Clive Adamson.

“However our review made it clear there were certain practices that did not stand up to scrutiny.

“In the guidance published today we are helping firms better understand our expectations.

“Now it is for firms to make sure any payments are legitimate, are in consumers’ interest and that potential conflicts are well managed.”

Will FOFA’s ban on conflicted remuneration be more successful? Have your say below.

Related Posts

Image: ergign/stock.adobe.com

InterPrac to defend ASIC claims over ‘external investment product failure’

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
4

Following the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) announcement that it had commenced civil proceedings against InterPrac Financial Planning, ASX-listed...

Image: Benjamin Crone/stock.adobe.com

Banned licensee under fire over $114m of investments in Shield

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
2

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought leave to commence proceedings that allege MWL operated a business model,...

brain

Emotional intelligence remains a vital skill for the modern adviser

by Alex Driscoll
November 14, 2025
0

Financial advice, more so than other wealth management professions, relies deeply on a well-functioning and collaborative relationship between professional and...

Comments 2

  1. Michael Summers says:
    12 years ago

    You’re on the right track, Dave, but the focus is always on the adviser who may be receiving conflicted rem – never on the fund manager or insurance company that is making the payment. No Payment – no conflict!Since FOFA was first floated and the term “vertical integration” entered our vocabulary it has been obvious that managers would devise schemes that ensure that in-house advisers use house financial products. ASIC will do well to look more closely at institutional methods of rewarding advisers! The community deserves a more fair and transparent deal.

    Reply
  2. Dave says:
    12 years ago

    If the dealer groups/self licenced enforce the rules–it will work. ASIC has the power to enforce and should use it-knock the incentives out at licence level and the results should be there. Chasing individual advisers only hits the small fry-a dealer group is far less likely to step over the line. Vertical integrated issues will still exist though.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited