The government’s response to the Quality of Advice Review (QAR) was delivered in June, but the head of policy at the Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) believes it’s very unlikely that legislation to implement areas of the QAR will be ready this year.
Speaking on an upcoming episode of the ifa podcast, Mr Anderson said: “This is not going to be a quick fix”.
“We can’t just suddenly say advice documents will be five pages long and they suddenly become five pages. We need to focus on the change management that’s necessary to achieve this outcome, which is that advisers need to be confident with it, associations need to be confident, licensees, AFCA, and really importantly, ASIC needs to be on the same page as everyone else in doing this.
“So, I’m not going to predict that we’ll see draft legislation before the end of this year, but certainly in the early part of next year, we would like to ensure that we have legislation and then it pretty quickly moves through the process so that we can achieve the benefits sooner rather than later,” Mr Anderson said.
Reflecting on the guarantees Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones gave ahead of Labor’s election win, Mr Anderson said the one thing everyone can learn from this experience is to “be careful with what you promise”.
“Invariably, things take longer than you might hope at the start, and that means that … rather than over promise, under promise and deliver is probably the better way to handle it,” he said.
Namely, back in May 2022, Mr Jones promised he would act swiftly on things like the experience pathway. “Sworn in, consultation process, let’s get this done,” he said at the time.
However, the experience pathway was only introduced into parliament last month.
“We all want things to happen and we think the process is simple. But you go back and you have a look at the timeframe for implementing major reforms, the FOFA reforms that started on the first of July 2013 were kicked off by the Ripoll Inquiry that was released in November of 2009. So, look, this is nearly four years,” Mr Anderson said.
“Equally, you look at the royal commission, the hearings were in April of 2018. Really the last piece of that, the CSLR, has only just passed. So, it does take time. The other thing that’s really important is, so on a few different levels, whilst we think that Steven Jones is the Minister for Financial Advice, he’s actually the Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services,” he noted.
While acknowledging that advisers want to see things implemented promptly, he added that “unfortunately it does take time and there are different steps that you have to go through”.
“There’s consultation on the policy, there’s the drafting of the legislation, and you’ve got to get access to the drafters. Then once you’ve got the draft legislation, you’ve got to go through the consultation process and there could be committees, parliamentary committees that consider the final legislation,” Mr Anderson said.
“And then you’ve actually got to see it through the Parliament, through both houses of the Parliament.”
In June, Mr Jones unveiled the government’s anticipated response to the QAR in front of a small audience of superannuation fund CEOs and senior industry executives. He announced, at the time, that the government will accept 14 of the 22 recommendations made by QAR lead Michelle Levy, and that “we can move quickly” on problems that have “a ready-made answer”, while “working together to solve the latter”.
ifa understands that the minister has begun consulting with the associations and their members, with a broader consultation process set to follow later this year.




Don’t worry Labor will be back in opposition before you know it given Aussies have turned against Albo and co. due to cost of living, etc. Looks like the NO vote will get up which will kill them. Back to the Liberals who may choose to help us this time around but I won’t hold my breath!
Stephen Jones is a fraud. He has no intention of making professional advice more affordable and accessible for consumers. He is deliberately making professional advice hard to get, so he can justify allowing union super funds to “fill the advice gap” with conflicted, unqualified, sales spiel.
There would be no advice gap if Jones actually fixed the hot mess of bad regulation, instead of just paying lip service to it. Meanwhile he waves through a 300% increase in adviser regulatory fees without a moments hesitation.
Pre & Post Electionitis
It’s a horrible disease that seems to afflict every Politician who craves power.
Wasn’t there this use of language that described ‘easy wins’? Where did they go?
I’m cynical enough to believe that anything that will help qualified advisers will take forever, or may not even be implemented at all.
Whilst anything that can increase the abilities for super funds will proceed far more easily and rapidly.
The seemingly hypocritical raising of the ASIC fee last week has made me become even more cautious of the Minister and his intentions for our profession.
Absolutely 100% correct, problem is we just don’t have anyone in Govt. or Treasury on our side
Talk with Dutton and his party he might be your best bet now…
Fact find captures present financial position engagement acceptance covers scope cost and goals. Why can’t it just be the strategy over 1 or 2 pages and fee disclosure 1ce. Then research and modelling separately and if the client wants it. No brainer. So many things DO NOT need to be replicated in an advice document if the total file is taken into consideration which is exactly what afca said they’d do regardless of the outcome on SoAs. Just a time wasting exercise and as smart as Phil is his advocacy since before fofa has been ineffectual. SOMEONE push the government to DO and not CONSULT on the CHOKING red tape, they were quick to up the Levy and charge advisers for CSOLR so it’s possible just not with this attitude and approach. Disappointing Phil
Here he goes…slowing down everything…
Be positive, Mr Anderson. Hopefully, these bureaucrats will be empowered by you. They have no shame in denying responsibility for the mess they’ve created. With so many advisers dumping this “profession”, surely, it’s time to stop the bleeding?
Same ol’ same ol’, when it’s of benefit to advisers then it’s no quick fix. But when the Govt. (a.k.a. MP Jane Hume) wants to rush through FDS under the guise of – “no more invisible fees” they don’t have a problem rushing the legisaltion through and executing in rapid fashion. What happened to MP Jones in the first 3 months “we’ll fix the hot mess”???
It is irrelevant what the Govt does. It comes down to what the PI insurers & AFCA decide to do.
You nailed it. Never mind the PI mafia, maybe, AFCA might be persuaded to adopt a collaborative rather than adversarial disposition towards us advisers? Yeah, nah. We’re just sitting ducks, waiting for the next round of gunshots.
This is not correct. AFCA and bound by interpretation of legs and PI cover reactive to claims…
Correct. Even AFCA have already stated they look at the file more than the SOA.
Just deal with the red tape Phil, don’t be a barrier mate