The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called out the risks of climate change and the impact it is expected to have on investment portfolio performance of superannuation funds in its latest discussion paper released on Friday.
“In the absence of a commitment to net-zero greenhouse emissions by 2050, the superannuation industry stands to lose billions of dollars in investment returns on behalf of their members, which ultimately translates to less retirement savings,” said ASFA CEO Dr Martin Fahy.
The amount in superannuation assets at the end of the March 2021 quarter totalled $3.1 trillion. Of the assets held by APRA-regulated superannuation funds, $467 billion was invested in Australian listed shares, $159 billion was invested in listed and unlisted property, $551 billion was invested in international shares, and $119 billion was invested in infrastructure.
Given the diversity of assets held by super funds, the ASFA warned that the overall exposure to climate change risk is significant.
As such, it urged funds to consider climate change risk when making decisions.
The mitigation strategies that have been explored include a commitment by superannuation funds to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in their investment portfolio by 2050; engaging with businesses on climate change risk to support them on their journey to mitigate climate change risk; and adopting the Principles of Responsible Investment approach.
In regard to meeting net zero by 2050, the ASFA highlighted the benefits of purchasing green bonds, noting their reliability and immense growth potential.
On the PRI front, the ASFA highlighted the three-step approach for asset owners when responding to climate change risk — supported by the United Nations.
Step one includes incorporating ESG issues into investment analysis and decision-making processes. Step two entails being active owners and incorporating ESG issues into ownership policies and practices, while step three means appropriately disclosing ESG issues and reporting on progress in implementing the PRI.
The ASFA is seeking feedback on its paper by COB Friday, 15 October 2021.
Let investors make this decision themselves.
If you want to offer an investment choice – offer the choice.
Making it mandated across a fund is ideological not sound investment strategy (as this guy is pretending it is).
Complete shit from the woke, socialist SFA who are dominated by ISFs. It is about transfer of power, money and sovereignty, not investment.
i hope you dont manage client money tbh. CC is real, and so are the investment risks that come with it. The world is transitioning to renewables, whether you like it or not. You dont want to be holding assets that nobody wants.
The world is a big place – and not all of it is anywhere near ready or willing to move to renewables. That’s my view – you put you money behind your opinion as I will mine.
All assets have a price that reflects their perceived value. Climate change noise has been around for a while now and is well and truly reflected in asset prices. It no longer has any bearing on future investment returns as values have already been adjusted.