X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Storm CEO alleges ASIC-CBA cover-up

The former chief executive of Storm Financial has accused the corporate regulator and Commonwealth Bank of teaming up to perpetuate a “blame Storm message”.

by Staff Writer
December 19, 2013
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a submission to the Senate inquiry into ASIC, former Storm boss Emmanuel Cassimatis laid out the reasons behind the collapse of the financial planning group, placing blame squarely at the feet of those beyond Storm management.

While Mr Cassimatis says he “regret[s] the complete loss of Storm clients” as well as his own personal “financial ruin”, he argues the collapse may have been avoidable if it weren’t were a “lack of co-operation by both the CBA and ASIC in providing all of the facts relating to their involvement”.

X

The former CEO alleges that the demise of Storm Financial was a “textbook example” of “manipulation by ASIC of evidence to facilitate predetermined outcomes” and that the corporate regulator refused to accept evidence of “wrongdoing” by CBA in the form of a “systemic product data defect with margin loan records” that assisted Storm’s entry into administration.

“A decision was taken at the highest levels within the CBA to cover their failures rather than admit them,” Mr Cassimatis alleges. “To this end the CBA had to ensure its ‘blame Storm’ message was heard whilst at the same time Storm’s protestations were suppressed. To facilitate this, the CBA required the assistance of ASIC to keep Storm at bay.”

Mr Cassimatis further alleges that Storm advisers presented evidence of “CBA breaches” to the corporate regulator but that “ASIC refused to meet with the Storm advisers to view such evidence”.

In September 2012, CBA announced it had reached a resolution with ASIC in relation to Storm, agreeing to a $136 million settlement for CBA customers “who invested through Storm”.

“We are pleased to have reached an agreement with ASIC on this matter as it is in the best interests of our customers to avoid lengthy and uncertain litigation,” said CBA group general counsel David Cohen at the time.

“This result delivers certainty to our customers who might otherwise have faced further years of delay before any final litigation result would have been known.”

Related Posts

Image: ergign/stock.adobe.com

InterPrac to defend ASIC claims over ‘external investment product failure’

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
4

Following the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) announcement that it had commenced civil proceedings against InterPrac Financial Planning, ASX-listed...

Image: Benjamin Crone/stock.adobe.com

Banned licensee under fire over $114m of investments in Shield

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
2

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought leave to commence proceedings that allege MWL operated a business model,...

brain

Emotional intelligence remains a vital skill for the modern adviser

by Alex Driscoll
November 14, 2025
0

Financial advice, more so than other wealth management professions, relies deeply on a well-functioning and collaborative relationship between professional and...

Comments 7

  1. Loftus says:
    12 years ago

    Would the Storm client offering have passed the “Mum” test?
    Mannie, would you, Julie and the rest of the ex MLC team of advisers have happily placed their respective Mums into such an aggressive gearing strategy ?

    Reply
  2. Big fella says:
    12 years ago

    We might also ask why ASIC is interfering with a mediated outcome between Macquarie Bank and class action members?

    We will see what comes out of a further class action against ASIC for failing to execute its statutory obligations and core business.

    ASIC has a lot to answer for in this matter, especially its strategic protection of CBA interests and appalling performance generally.

    Reply
  3. leop says:
    12 years ago

    Kev Rosser – hehe nice try but you not receiving further compensation is hardly noteworthy of an ASIC/CBA conspiracy. what is it with greedy storm investors and their constant chant for more more more? its more likely your version of ‘loss’ is deeply flawed.

    IFA – why give air to comments from any Cassimatis? they have proven to be routinely untrustworthy.

    Reply
  4. Kev Rosser says:
    12 years ago

    Another reason to wonder about ASIC and CBA is the recent “settlement out of court” between ASIC and CBA where people who lost everything and had previously been given 1o cents in the dollar by CBA were to be recompensed to the order of 50 cents in the dollar. In my case I was told that I had lost nothing and was therefore entitled to nothing! ASIC settled out of court with CBA for nothing!! The CBA margin call which I didn’t get resulted in a loss for me of around $800,000 Is that nothing? I had been retired for 6 years at the end of 2008 and had to go back to work to service the mortgage on my house. It required me to relocate 700 km from my house and make my house available for rent. My house was mortgaged through ANZ and they were very sympathetic and helpful to me.

    Reply
  5. Cecil says:
    12 years ago

    ASIC and CBA did get away with some poor action. Sadly not a reliable witness here to make the point. RESEAU at the same time went down with over $80 million of many peoples hard earned. I remember spending several hours trying to alert ASIC to it well before the collapse. Gave up with the brick wall of incompetence there.
    http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/as…
    Just as big as Storm and swept under the carpet. There needs to be a conduit for planners and other finance professionals to deal with ASIC. They have an email now but I suspect that this just goes into a pile not followed up.

    Reply
  6. George says:
    12 years ago

    Mr. Cassimitis you have found out the very hard way that their truly is no honour amongst theives!

    Just take your lumps!

    Reply
  7. B Real says:
    12 years ago

    Come on Mannie. Your financial ruin? The fees you charged those poor clients for a “one size fits all” product flog…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited