X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Sequoia ‘assisting’ ASIC’s Venture Egg investigation

The firm has said it is aiding the regulator’s investigation into the “extremely complex matter” and that Interprac had “no conflict” regarding its advisers’ recommendations.

by Keith Ford
April 10, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Sequoia managing director Garry Crole told ifa that the group’s subsidiary, Interprac Financial Planning, is working with ASIC as it investigates financial adviser Ferras Merhi and Venture Egg Financial Services.

In February, the Federal Court made interim orders freezing certain assets of Merhi in connection with its investigations concerning certain managed investment schemes, including Shield Master Trust and First Guardian Master Fund.

X

Merhi controls Venture Egg, and both he and Venture Egg are authorised representatives of Interprac Financial Planning. He also controls Financial Services Group Australia, which holds an AFSL.

The next hearing related to Merhi is currently scheduled for 26 May 2025.

In an ASX release, Sequoia acknowledged that “ASIC has commenced an investigation into suspected contraventions of the Corporations Act & ASIC Act 2001 by Interprac and/or its representatives”.

According to the firm, Interprac is assisting the regulator to ensure that the “interim freezing orders have not been, and are not, breached by Mr Merhi and/or other of his associated entities”.

It is also reviewing the “obligations of the rating authorities with respect of the Funds” and its obligations related to the “advice provided compared to the performance of, and conduct engaged by, the funds”.

Sequoia added that it would consider the obligations of trustees, auditors and custodians of the funds, the obligations of platform providers through which the investments into the funds were made, and review its operations and systems.

While Crole told ifa that he could not “provide any additional information at this point in time”, he noted that the Shield and First Guardian situation was “an extremely complex matter”.

“Deloitte is undertaking a detailed process to manage the funds in the best interests of members who hold superannuation balances with various platforms that offered them as investment choices,” he said.

“Interprac is assisting ASIC with their investigation into the matter which is highly complex, involving the roles and responsibilities of the trustees, auditors, custodians, and platform providers and do confirm Interprac as AFSL had no conflict in regards to recommendations made by its advisers into the Macquarie, Equity Trustees and Netwealth platforms where these underlying funds were offered.”

According to comments Merhi has made previously, Venture Egg has about 5,000 clients with $250 million in Shield and 3,600 clients with $192 million invested in First Guardian, putting the total exposure for clients in excess of $440 million.

ASIC’s ‘most complex’ investigations

In his opening address to Senate estimates in February, ASIC chair Joe Longo said the “investigations around the Shield Master Fund are among the most complex that ASIC is undertaking at the moment”.

“I think they’re very serious for all Australians,” the chair said following questions from Senator Barbara Pocock.

“The amount of money involved, ordinary Australians being talked into doing things that really ought not to have occurred. There really is misconduct.”

In February 2024, ASIC halted new offers of investments in Shield Master Fund and made interim stop orders on four product disclosure statements for Shield.

In June 2024, ASIC took action to secure the assets held within Shield. ASIC sought the appointment of Jason Tracy and Lucica Palaghia of Deloitte as receivers and managers of the property of Keystone Asset Management (KAM).

In December 2024, ASIC noted that the creditors of Keystone had resolved to wind up KAM and appoint Jason Tracy and Glen Kanevsky of Deloitte as joint and several liquidators.

“The investigation to date suggests that potential investors were called by lead generators and referred to personal financial advice providers who advised investors to roll their superannuation assets into a retail choice superannuation fund and then to invest part or all of their superannuation into Shield,” the regulator said in December.

As a result of this, ASIC said its investigation of the circumstances surrounding Shield includes KAM and its directors and officers, the role of the superannuation trustees, the financial advisers who recommended investors invest in Shield, the lead generators, and others.

“It has come to ASIC’s attention that Venture Egg (a financial adviser who has advised clients to invest in Shield) has issued letters to investors dated 29 November 2024 and 2 December 2024,” ASIC added at the time.

“ASIC is concerned that the information in the letters is incomplete and some of the statements in the letters are inaccurate.”

In October, ASIC cancelled the AFSL of Queensland-based Next Generation Advice, which is in liquidation and had recommended investments that included the Global Capital Property Fund and the Shield Master Fund.

Related Posts

Image: ergign/stock.adobe.com

InterPrac to defend ASIC claims over ‘external investment product failure’

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
0

Following the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) announcement that it had commenced civil proceedings against InterPrac Financial Planning, ASX-listed...

Image: Benjamin Crone/stock.adobe.com

Banned licensee under fire over $114m of investments in Shield

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
0

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought leave to commence proceedings that allege MWL operated a business model,...

brain

Emotional intelligence remains a vital skill for the modern adviser

by Alex Driscoll
November 14, 2025
0

Financial advice, more so than other wealth management professions, relies deeply on a well-functioning and collaborative relationship between professional and...

Comments 15

  1. Anonymous says:
    4 months ago

    I’m Happy to nane the venture egg financial advisers involved if it helps and the financial planning companies they have been re-employed with 

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    4 months ago

    I’m someone who has been affected by this and with 3/4 of my super invested based on the recommendations of a financial advisor. I feel like a silly silly person who trusted an individual to help grow hers
    And her families future. How horrible to want to help build a better future for my family and future generations without having to rely on government handouts. 

    They should be held accountable for their actions. 
    Assuming I now have to start from scratch as a part time working mum with two small children and not knowing if I can get any funds from my super that were set up by Venture egg. 

    Shame on you. 

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    4 months ago

    No lessons learnt after royal commission. 

    I have been a financial adviser for over 10 years and I always invest my clients money where I have my own money invested 

    This is pure example of how ASIC & Government has no clue what is going on. 

    Rather than making the laws stronger & making AFSL , Trustee accountable, someone will just get a slap on the wrist and let them off. 

    I cannot imagine the stress these 6000 clients would be going through!!!

    This should be a wake up call for the labour government & ASIC that nothing has changed after royal commission. 

    This is also one of the reason consumers find it hard to trust financial advisers !!

    Wake up 

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    5 months ago

    I am one of these 5800 people more than 50% frozen in these 2 funds … what happens to me now, we don’t own a home and I’m the only bread winner, I have been salary sacrificing for over 10 years, this was my future…. Is it all lost forever ? 

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    6 months ago

    I’m a relative of one of these 5800 people and my relative never spoke to anyone about this.  AMP has a hand in all this too. Where is their responsibility

    Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    6 months ago

    This is an epic failure by the regulator ASIC as well!  How on earth did this goes undetected for so long?  5,800 individuals that will now become part of the already stressed government pension because financial advisors were greedy, corrupt and the regulator fast asleep!    Despite the chaos, the opportunity losses for these 5,800 individuals are immense!  Yet the ATO collected taxes in these contributions.  These individuals should be fully compensated as it’s a government and regulatory agency failure on an epic scale.  

    Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    7 months ago

    Why is interprac as afsl not footing the bill for this? Where is their PI? Were these funds on their APL? If yes is surely on them and their PI?  If no how the hell does one of their AR put 8000 + clients and nearly Billion fum into funds not on their APL?  Can already see the writing on the wall with this one…small business professional advisers underwriting client losses from mass scale corporate greed. MIS MUST be in the CSLR. Those that reaped the millions MIST be held accountable. Meanwhile I’m terrified of being banned for advising a client that goes over their super caps even with ATO portal info which is reliant on super funds to actually report on time and accurately. If AFSL is truly responsible what’s the complication? Why bother with AFSL system if all it does is run a protection racquet and the Phoenix up into parent AFSL? Enuffs enuff

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      6 months ago

      ASIC should also be held accountable!  How did they not pick this up earlier.  5,800 individuals and half a billion dollars flown into a fund that wasn’t even 2 years old!!! This is a regulatory failure and the government should be held accountable as well. Sell all assets of all financial advisors, they benefited from a fraud. 

      Reply
  8. Anonymous says:
    7 months ago

    Has there been anything else bigger and more complex than this current situation? I’ll also be interested to see which directors or executives will personally be fined.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      7 months ago

      i mite not understand this right but did venture egg have 5000 clients with $440m FUA in these products?  

      Reply
      • Anonymous says:
        6 months ago

        Yes, they got 5,800 clients within 2 years!  How did that not rang alarm bells with InterPrac and ASIC.  Both InterPrac and ASIC should also be held accountable.  

        Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      6 months ago

      This needs a Royal Commission enquiry.  ASIC as a regulator failed these 5,800 individuals impacted.  Worst is, now they’re freezing assets and not having appropriate mechanisms in place for management of the remaining super balances of these individuals.   This is an epic failure by the regulator that should have oversight.  

      Reply
  9. Anonymous says:
    7 months ago

    What is the point, everyone knows how this plays out,  see if this seems familiar.  ASIC will perform a thorough investigation, making sure to charge every minute to the ASIC Levy/Tax.  Despite them being warned of the consumer harm many years prior, they will eventually write a nice press release detailing what went wrong.   They will decline to prosecute anyone who profited from the consumer harm, because that would require them to do some real work.  Instead they will steer all the clients who were harmed into the CSLR scheme/tax and all good honest advisers will be forced to pay instead.  Guaranteed!

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      7 months ago

      ASIC seems to be collecting fees to supervise these AFSL’s at the front end and then charge again when it all fails?  All billing and no responsibility?

      Can’t even sack them for poor performance?

      Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      6 months ago

      Royal Commission enquiry as ASIC as regulator failed these 5,800 individuals.  

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited