Why the feared adviser exodus never arrived – and what it means for M&A in 2026
While consolidation is accelerating, Prendeville stressed that successful deals are less about headline price and more about cultural alignment, client...
While consolidation is accelerating, Prendeville stressed that successful deals are less about headline price and more about cultural alignment, client...
Vogiatzis argues that for many younger investors, the real risk is being too conservative for too long, rather than riding...
With advisers under pressure to deliver tailored portfolios while preserving efficiency, Cho explains why scalable, rules-based investment solutions – particularly...
Congratulations on winning Holistic Adviser of Year QLD at the ifa awards, what do you think set you apart to win this...
They unlocked accessibility, slashed costs and opened up diversification across listed asset classes in a way that previously only institutions...
According to Iress and Deloitte’s The Big Lift report, despite decades of reforms, rising wealth, and an increasingly sophisticated advice...
What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you? The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...
This poll has closed
© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited
© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited
Aleks While I admire Wacka for his zeal, his comments that risk needs commission, not fees, so the average punter can get advice, are frankly a bit late. He really can’t bathe in the glow of a banking royal commission, because the banks had got what they wanted before the announcement when LIF made their insurance arms more attractive to overseas buyers. Why wasn’t Wacka in the ear of Frydenberg and O’Dwyer before LIF was legislated. He also is praising ASIC too much, considering their blind ideology to eliminating risk commissions. BTW, did the AFA ever go to Wacka ?
I heard him speak when LIF was proposed but not legislated (I think) and he mentioned that reducing commissions wouldn’t have a negative impact on the financial planning industry and something had to be done given that financial planners had been selling insurance policies to clients that had already passed away. Only problem was that the situation he referenced were non financial planners working for Combined Insurance. Like all politicians he speaks to what he thinks the audience wants and shouldn’t be trusted. Basically he hates banks because of something which happened on the family farm and is running his personal agenda — for the record I don’t work for a bank.