X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Restrict institutional advice to internal products: AIOFP

The head of the Association of Independently Owned Financial Professionals (AIOFP) says any “advisers” employed at institutions should be restricted to providing product information.

by Keith Ford
February 29, 2024
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Speaking on the latest episode of the ifa podcast, Peter Johnston, the executive director of the AIOFP, said that one of the foremost topics surrounding the Quality of Advice Review reforms is the ability for people within organisations such as super funds, banks, and life insurers to provide information to clients.

Mr Johnston noted that there is little chance the way this is provided is through someone called a “qualified adviser” – as he pointed out, that notion is “a dead duck, there’s no doubt there, and deservedly so” – the situation that the AIOFP would be happy with is institutions being able to provide information on their internal products.

X

“We don’t like the idea of the qualified adviser situation,” he said.

“We think what all these organisations should be able to do, the banks, the insurance companies, etc, super funds, what they should be allowed to do is have trained internal staff, who just give information about their own internal product.

“Us advisers don’t want to do that. So, we just think they should be permitted to do it after training course, which is done internally. Then if they get people ringing up their members of their super fund or policyholders, etc, these people can talk about that particular policy or that particular fund or that particular account balance.

“Independent advisers don’t really want to do that.”

Additionally, Mr Johnston argued that these providers wouldn’t need to attain any level of qualification at all, just a training program as “all they’re doing is giving information about their product”.

“If these people want to then go on to become a financial adviser, they start studying and then gradually get into it because we need more advisers out there over the next 30 years,” he said.

“So we think they should consider doing that and then most super funds are going down the path of using external independent advisers, which is where they refer the work on. This is for advice outside of their superannuation account balance.”

He offered the example of a super fund member who has just inherited some money and requires advice as the type of work the super funds are looking at outsourcing.

“For them to have internal financial advisers, which are looking at $200,000 plus with compliance put on wages, APRA is having a very close look at that because there’s just reserves being spent on these teams of financial advisers, which they don’t really have to pay for in-house,” Mr Johnston added.

“They’re far better to outsource that independent work to the independent advisers. Then they have a trained internal staff to give the day-to-day information on Centrelink and also the circumstances of their product.

“We think that makes sense. We don’t think we should get rid of the best interest duty. We think that should stay because we’re all meant to be doing the best thing by the client … So, they’re the two major things we’d like to see fixed.”

To hear more from Peter Johnston, tune in here.

Related Posts

Image: ergign/stock.adobe.com

InterPrac to defend ASIC claims over ‘external investment product failure’

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
4

Following the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) announcement that it had commenced civil proceedings against InterPrac Financial Planning, ASX-listed...

Image: Benjamin Crone/stock.adobe.com

Banned licensee under fire over $114m of investments in Shield

by Keith Ford
November 14, 2025
2

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has sought leave to commence proceedings that allege MWL operated a business model,...

brain

Emotional intelligence remains a vital skill for the modern adviser

by Alex Driscoll
November 14, 2025
0

Financial advice, more so than other wealth management professions, relies deeply on a well-functioning and collaborative relationship between professional and...

Comments 10

  1. Did all the training,for what? says:
    2 years ago

    “information” should not be misconstrued for “advice”. I’m not entirely certain that the super funds will be happy to allow financial advisers to, exclusively, provide advice.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    Great idea

    Reply
  3. Canberra Madness says:
    2 years ago

    QAR is purely a Product Flog
    Labor owned by Industry Super 
    LNP owned by Banks & Life Co’s. 

    If Canberra had any real interest in Real Advice and Real Advisers then they would shred the Gordian Knot, tip out the Hot Mess and let Real Advisers do their job with 70% less BS Red Tape. 
    Then Real Advisers could serve 3 times, 4 times the clients currently and then there is no need for QAR product floggers. 

    But blind Freddy of Real Advisers knows that Canberra has zero interest in anything EXCEPT PRODUCT FLOGGERS VIA INDUSTRY SUPER, BANKS & LIFE CO’s. 

    REAL ADVISERS should now market ourselves as REAL ADVISERS. 
    Let’s start the differentiation ourselves. 

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    The AIOFP is doing more harm than good. Ramblings about trying to get grandfathered commissions reinstated, Advisers pushing their clients bases to vote in a particular way etc. It’s all waffle that makes us look unprofessional and like we’re represented by a bunch of dinosaurs who want to go back to the old way of providing advice. 

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 years ago

      And the new way of Back Packer Sales call centres dressed up as Advice is a step forward ??? Really ??? 

      Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 years ago

      Completely disagree.  The approach of the FAAA has clearly completely failed? 

      Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    and rather than qualified advisers they should be named product advisers

    and if they do not have to provide soa to provide product advice then neither should any financial advisers

    Reply
  6. desk jockey says:
    2 years ago

    in other words, make no change whatsoever..

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 years ago

      Seriously?

      Reply
      • Anonymous says:
        2 years ago

        yes, this is called intra-fund advice today.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited