Responding to shadow financial services minister Pat Conaghan’s questioning in Parliament last week, Mulino pushed back on the suggestions that the government had “ignored warnings from Treasury and ASIC to effectively regulate” managed investment schemes.
“What I can say is I haven’t ignored any warnings,” the minister said.
“When I was notified of this matter earlier this year, I very quickly sought a briefing from my department in relation to the matter. Following on from that, having found out about these matters, I wrote to APRA to receive briefings from APRA in relation to what further actions might be needed in relation to platforms.
“I’ve been working constructively with the Financial Services Council and with the industry on that matter. Furthermore, I’ve written to ASIC in relation to whether or not capital holding requirements of MISs are sufficient.”
Mulino added that Treasury has provided briefings around how the government could “strengthen regulatory arrangements going forward”.
“I would say to this chamber and, of course, to the member who’s asked this question that, as we consider options going forward, I certainly look forward to working constructively with members of this House in order to find ways we can strengthen arrangements going forward,” he added.
Conaghan had probed why the government had not acted despite beginning a review of MISs in March 2023.
The review’s progress had been halted while the parliamentary joint committee (PJC) on corporations and financial services conducted a spin-off review of the wholesale and sophisticated investor thresholds, which ultimately decided not to take any action in February this year.
However, in the months since, there has been no word on the MIS review seeing the light of day, with Conaghan accusing the government of burying the review.
“Billions of dollars of everyday Australians’ retirement savings are now at risk, lost in the collapse of dodgy schemes like First Guardian and Shield, all of them so-called managed investment schemes,” he said in September.
“What were the recommendations? Could implementing those recommendations have protected these investors? Could they have protected hard-working Australians who have done the right thing and now have lost everything? We simply don’t know because this government has bizarrely buried its own report.
“The government should be providing answers to everyday Australians, but, once again, Labor are asleep at the wheel.”
While he denied that he had ignored any warnings, Minister Mulino acknowledged that more needs to be done to ensure impacted Australian’s are not left without retirement savings.
“I want to acknowledge from the outset how distressing this has been for many people who have lost considerable amounts of funds. There are many individuals and families who have lost a significant proportion of their life savings. I’ve met with victims of these collapses. I have heard firsthand harrowing stories, and I understand how difficult this has been,” he said.
“Can I stress that the focus of ASIC, the independent regulator, over recent months has been to protect investor funds, and it has undertaken a range of actions to do so. It has a range of actions already underway in court.
“This includes actions in relation to financial advisers involved in these collapses. It also involves actions against individuals involved in the managed investment schemes. Importantly, there were also significant actions in relation to the platforms.”
The minister pointed specifically to Macquarie’s decision to reimburse its members the $321 million needed to fully return their capital investment.
“A significant proportion of the investors in the Shield MIS will see a full return of their capital,” he said.
“But I do acknowledge that there is more work to be done, and I continue to work with ASIC and with other regulators in relation to the immediate priority of protecting investor interests.”




So all the platform trustees involved are allowed to claim they were defrauded… SQM claims they were lied to when issuing Favourable investment ratings for both funds.
But then it’s simultaneously unrealistic to everyone that financial advisers were lied to and defrauded…
How does that even make sense when advisers are supposed to be able to rely on APRA regulated super funds and regulated research houses…
It is 1 rule for the big guys and another rule for small business financial advisers.
” Hot Mess Jones” has now been appointed as Australia’s Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the OECD based in Paris !!!!!
Penny Wong wrote…” In Government, Mr Jones delivered reforms to strengthen Australia’s superannuation and financial systems, modernise markets and improve the integrity of our tax system”.
Sure Penny.
Over promised and under delivered.
Enjoy the croissants and baguettes Stephen…you have truly earn’t the French holiday of a lifetime !!!
Why is he quoting ‘consulting the Financial Services Council’ as if they are the industry voice. When did that happen?!
“What I can say is I haven’t ignored any warnings,” the minister said.
As for Hot Mess Jones, how many warnings did he ignore on MIS disasters ?
MIS enquiry that Hot Mess promised to exclude MIS from CSLR, buried for last 2 years.
What an absolute rort from ALP and Hot Mess Jones.