PPS Mutual chief executive Michael Pillemer said while factors such as increased mental health claims had partly fuelled the recent billion-dollar losses incurred by life insurers, this could also be attributed to the companies’ pursuit of short-term strategies to inflate market share.
“Some of the practices insurers have been engaging in as part of the market share chase have contributed to the problem – front-loaded discounts are emblematic of the poor practices that have contributed to these results,” Mr Pillemer said.
“Others are soft underwriting by insurers and the underwriting deals that have been created for special customers or advisers.”
Generous product terms and features can be priced for if they are appropriate and meet the needs of the client, but if you’ve got these deals that advantage new customers at the expense of loyal customers, these are some of the problems that we need to ensure don’t continue to undermine product sustainability.”
Mr Pillemer said APRA had been forced to step in with its recent reforms to the income protection market, as insurers were too afraid of losing market share to create more sustainable income protection products on their own.
“With APRA’s recent income protection reforms, it’s been focused on the generous product terms offered and particularly on the first mover reluctance to wind back terms, despite fear of the unsustainability of losing business,” he said.
“That is a valid assessment, particularly where design issues provide a disincentive for the claimant to return to work.”
Mr Pillemer said the large insurers’ short-termism had ripple effects on the adviser market, with risk advisers having to explain massive premium increases to clients and being increasingly restricted by regulatory change.
“Unfortunately a lot of the advisers have borne the brunt of what’s happened with the market share chase rather than the blame being laid at the feet of the insurers,” he said.
“Most advisers have been doing the right thing by their clients and they are going through an incredibly difficult time with the pandemic, the losses the industry is incurring and repeated increases in premiums coming in, the APRA reforms and the LIF changes.
“Those who have been around for 30 years plus have said this is by far the most difficult period that they’ve encountered.”
The comments came following PPS Mutual’s annual profit share announcement that saw members of the mutual insurance company collect a 7 per cent share of annual premiums and 4.5 per cent of their opening balances.
Mr Pillemer said the idea behind the profit share scheme was to build a “self-reinforcing cycle” where member lapse rates remained low, leading to improved profits and lower premiums.
“You’ve got a model where the policyholder is a member and owner of the business so they are getting to share in the profits, they are happier, they are sticking around and once they are building up this profit share their retention is greater,” he said.




… but isn’t this just a play for marketshare?
I have just watched the PPS Mutual Profit Share video.
What a terrific model that places some value back into the hands of those policyholders that continue to support PPS and retain their insurance with the organisation.
When compared to the demutualised model of shareholder driven greed that destroyed adviser’s trust and relationships with insurers during the LIF debacle, it simply shows that engaging policyholder’s in a dollar value of the company’s success can work as opposed to giving a discount on a pair of sports shoes or some movie tickets !!
Not only that, the drive for market share will now penalise those loyal policyholders as the insurers significantly ramp up premiums in order to fund the depleting new business volumes and pay for their business strategy mistakes.
I have not placed any PPS Mutual business at present but am now very interested in finding out more.
Hi, thank you for your lovely comments and your indicated desire to get in touch; if you would like to discuss further please contact me on 0417 132 088 or swalmsley@ppsmutual.com.au
Yeah but how am I supposed to churn if the policy is meant to be inforce for 10 years?
One issue, maybe the bigger issues is your assassination of advice.
The main issue is that profit for shareholders is at odds with longer term policyholder value. The de-mutualisation that occurred in the late 90s saw the beginning of the end for the insurers. Isn’t it interesting that we are now back to mutuals being a solution?
Insurance companies copping there right whack
*their