X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Low-fee clients kneecapping practice values

A new report from a wealth management business broker has put further weight behind current claims that advisers cannot profitably service clients for below $3,000, revealing that clients who pay less than this are being ascribed a negative value during a business sale.

by Staff Writer
March 25, 2021
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read

Centurion Market Makers’ Financial Planning Practice Acquisition, Sale and Valuation Guide for 2021 revealed that current buyers of advice practices were taking a keen eye to the type and value of clients that advisers were servicing, making it difficult for the many smaller business owners exiting the industry to obtain a reasonable sale price.

“There has been a severe reduction in the profitability of clients at the lower end of the revenue range,” the report said.

X

“Our work indicates that it is very difficult to be profitable with a client with a fee under $3,000 per annum. Clients much below this level generally detract from value and have fallen to one to two times revenue, below $1,000 would be less than one times if they can be sold at all.”

Given rising regulatory costs across the industry, and the removal of grandfathered revenue, Centurion said practice buyers were factoring this in on valuation and applying a discount for low-value clients.

“The key acquirers in the market have a detailed understanding of their cost to serve and will price acquisitions accordingly, often applying a nil or negative value to small unprofitable clients,” the firm said.

Because of restrictions to business credit as a result of the royal commission, smaller practices were also more difficult to secure finance for, meaning they were less desirable for buyers, the report said.

“The royal commission has resulted in reduced access to credit for all small businesses as the banks rework their credit assessment and focus on cash flow and ability to repay,” Centurion said.

“Small financial planning practices have been caught in these outcomes and as such access to credit for ‘bolt on transactions’ has reduced. Our experience has been that purchasers who are interested in small books have been unable to raise cash flow lending finance and have had to provide ‘bricks and mortar’ security for the lending.”

In addition, the increasing cost to serve had led to more pressure on practices to get to higher revenue levels before they were considered a scalable business, according to the report.

“The point of scale for any practice has materially increased. This means that the revenue point where a practice starts to get the benefits of scale has increased,” Centurion said.

“Anecdotally, this would be well above $1.5 million in revenue.”

While the COVID pandemic had not had a long-lasting effect on valuations, the short-term impact on practices that were more reliant on asset-based fees had spurred more firms to transition to a pure flat fee model.

“Those practices with market linked income saw a reduction in revenue [from COVID]. At the peak, this was around 12.5 per cent with a consequent reduction in profit and valuation,” the report said.

“In a long-term sense, we don’t see COVID as creating an enduring reduction in value. It will however speed the transition to purer fee for service models and change operating models permanently.”

Related Posts

Image: FAAA

Why the $3m super tax should see advisers given ATO portal access

by Keith Ford
January 23, 2026
1

One of the long-burning priorities for financial advisers has been gaining access to the Australian Taxation Office’s (ATO) Online services...

Adviser numbers steady as post-deadline volatility fades

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
January 23, 2026
0

Padua Wealth Data’s weekly analysis reveals a net loss of nine advisers for the week ending 22 January, bringing the...

Image: Eric Akashi/stock.adobe.com

‘Greed, incompetence and arrogance’: $1m theft sees former adviser jailed

by Laura Dew
January 23, 2026
0

Appearing at the District Court of Western Australia on Thursday, Anthony Paul Torre was sentenced by his honour Judge John...

Comments 5

  1. Anonymous says:
    5 years ago

    Any adviser who is servicing a client who is paying less than $1,000 per annum CANNOT be doing all they are meant to. (Read non-compliant.)

    Reply
    • old bob says:
      5 years ago

      Plenty of reasons, and jumping to non compliant is not fair. It’s pro-bono work yes, and why not after the client has been with you for 20 plus years… Perhaps the adviser is prepared to subsidized it, perhaps Mum and Dad are high net and the kids are not being charged. Nothing wrong, it’s just the exposure that you’re prepared to do. Maybe you could consider selling the BMW and drive a Toyota ?

      Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    5 years ago

    Increasing scale also leads to decreased communication and increased chances of things going wrong.

    I agree with Centurion though. From July 1st those numbers could go up substantially again. Financial planning will only be for the rich. Everyone else can go to industry funds for both insurance and investments. Probably not what the Liberal government intended but they are not pursuing the only alternative – the FPA’s individual licensing proposal.

    Reply
  3. old bob says:
    5 years ago

    Some of these small business are great opportunities. As you get larger you’re often taking on more staff, more headaches, more business management issues and you’re paying for all these. Certainly more clients that can’t be serviced. Plenty of small business with 50-100 clients charging less than $3,000 making more money than businesses earning significantly more, with no service issues whatsoever.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      5 years ago

      I’d like to know who is licensing you! $40-$50k in AR fees blows a huge hole in that pretty quickly.

      I obviously can’t speak for all of Centurion’s clients but we recently acquired a firm, cash flow lend through NAB wasn’t a bother at all, no bricks and mortar, just a PG over the loan but that’s understandable.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Holistic advice and why it matters for families: Q&A with Josh Dalton

Congratulations on winning Holistic Adviser of Year QLD at the ifa awards, what do you think set you apart to win this...

by Alex Driscoll
January 22, 2026
Promoted Content

Why this is the ETF moment for private markets

They unlocked accessibility, slashed costs and opened up diversification across listed asset classes in a way that previously only institutions...

by VentureCrowd
January 20, 2026
Promoted Content

‘We’re not even good yet’: Why advisers must lead Australia’s financial capability uplift

According to Iress and Deloitte’s The Big Lift report, despite decades of reforms, rising wealth, and an increasingly sophisticated advice...

by Iress
January 20, 2026
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited