X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Jones unveils first tranche of adviser reforms: SOAs absent from initial legislation

Minister Stephen Jones has unveiled the components of the first tranche of legislation for the government’s Delivering Better Financial Outcomes package of reforms, which will be released on Tuesday.

by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
November 13, 2023
in News
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Tuesday, the government is due to release the first tranche of draft legislation for its Delivering Better Financial Outcomes package of reforms – a package aimed at reducing red tape, as highlighted by Minister for Financial Services Stephen Jones, who emphasised that these changes would alleviate the cost of advice without compromising consumer benefits.

Among the recommendations that will be included in the draft legislation are:

X
  • Recommendation 7 – Clarifying the legal basis for superannuation trustees paying a member’s financial advice fees from their superannuation account, and associated tax consequences.
  • Recommendation 8 – Consolidating different ongoing fee consent documents into one simplified document.
  • Recommendation 10 – Allowing more flexibility in how financial services guides are provided.
  • Recommendations 13.1 to 13.5 – Clarifying that monetary or non-monetary benefits given by a client are not conflicted remuneration, along with the removal of consequential exceptions.
  • Recommendations 13.7 to 13.9 – Strengthening transparency and protections for consumers by introducing written consent requirements for consumers before they purchase an insurance product that will result in a commission payment.

But while the initial draft legislation adopts around half of the recommendations of the Quality of Advice Review (QAR), noticeably absent are several anticipated changes, including recommendations initially grouped under the first stream of the government’s QAR response back in June.

These include recommendation five, proposing the elimination of safe harbour steps from the best interests duty, and recommendation nine, advocating for the substitution of the lengthy and legalistic statements of advice (SOAs) with a financial advice record for consumers that is more fit for purpose.

Another noticeable change is that recommendation seven has been plucked from the second stream of the government’s QAR response – the expanding access to retirement income advice stream – and fast-tracked.

Absence of SOAs

Speaking at a media briefing on Monday afternoon, Mr Jones clarified that, regarding recommendations five and nine, the focus is on the “how” rather than the “if” and assured that policy directions would be outlined by the end of the year.

“There are a few things I’ve got to work through because the safe harbour has tentacles into other things,” the minister said.

“The statement of advice, they’re kind of related.”

The minister admitted that while he deliberated over whether to delay the first tranche of legislation to incorporate SOAs and safe harbour, ultimately, he opted not to impede the process.

“It’s just about being entirely pragmatic. What’s ready to go, let’s get it out, don’t hold it up,” he said.

Providing additional context regarding SOAs, the minister said that the consultations are “pretty much done”.

“We’re just working through some of the technical detail of it.”

While Minister Jones clarified that the exclusion of these recommendations from the first tranche of legislation would not delay their push through Parliament, he hinted that SOAs could now slot into stream two of the government’s legislative response to QAR.

“If anything, it might be the opportunity to accelerate some of the other stuff as well. For that stuff, it won’t delay. We’re always of the view that we’d get the draft legislation for stream one out this year and come back early next year with the draft legislation for stream two,” he said.

‘Pretty close’ on stream two

Touching on the inclusion of recommendation seven, Mr Jones explained that the legislation stipulates that funds will be allowed to pay a member’s financial advice fees from their superannuation account. It also clarifies the associated tax consequences for the funds.

On the remainder of the stream two recommendations, more specifically recommendation six, which suggests superannuation funds should provide more retirement advice, Mr Jones cited ongoing efforts to consolidate diverse ideas into a unified legislative instrument.

“Everyone had a different idea about what they wanted funds to be able to do. So, three things, scope of advice, competence or skills or training and qualifications required to provide that advice, and then what is funded as part of the normal operations of the fund and what is individually charged. So, working through the details of those three things,” the minister said.

“From a policy point of view, I think we’re pretty close. I’ve got to get whole of government complying on those things.”

He confirmed that the government will announce its final position on the outstanding recommendations of the QAR before the end of the year, with further legislation to be released in 2024.

Tranche one to lower cost of advice

Ultimately, the first tranche of the legislation will benefit people who are individually advised, Mr Jones said.

“The overwhelming majority of this is about financial planners and the people who are individually advised. For their client group, there should be a capacity for them to produce advice more efficiently. If it’s more efficient, then there should be cost savings in that,” the minister said.

“Advisers have been saying for some time now, ‘If you reduce the red tape, we’ll be able to provide more affordable services’. We’re going to reduce the red tape, over to you.”

The government will invite all interested parties to provide feedback on the draft legislation until 6 December.

Follow ifa on Tuesday for more coverage of the first tranche of legislation.

Related Posts

Image/Commonwealth Government

Mulino remains committed to ‘complicated’ DBFO reforms

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
4

Speaking at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Conference on the Gold Coast, Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino...

Advice reform legislation essential for positive results: HGA

by Alex Driscoll
November 13, 2025
0

Speaking on the ifa Show podcast Andrew Gale and Stephen Huppert from the Actuaries Institute’s Help, Guidance and Advice Working...

InterPrac, SQM Research hit with lawsuits over alleged Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
8

On Thursday morning, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced it has commenced civil penalty proceedings against InterPrac and...

Comments 32

  1. Don't get it. says:
    2 years ago

    How will this reduce advice fees. Inclusive of the insurance consents, I see fees rising. My fees are rising 1 January 2024 by CPI at the very least.
    I have waited long enough re this ridiculous QAR process. 

    Reply
  2. Pauline H says:
    2 years ago

    does this apply to industry funds now ? please explain

    Reply
  3. Chrisso says:
    2 years ago

    Who is surprised, I’m not. 

    Reply
  4. Jones Failure says:
    2 years ago

    He should be embarrassed. Misses his own self prescribed time lines to exclude the 1 thing Australia was waiting on. Pathetic

    Reply
    • Anon says:
      2 years ago

      Why would he be embarrased? It’s not like he is charging a fee (ie in this case drawing a wage) and not delivering a service he said he would……oh wait up that’s exactly what he is doing.

      Reply
  5. Spuds says:
    2 years ago

    After reading the comments I think Stephen Jones “hot mess” just got a lot hotter…

    You could not make this stuff up!

    Reply
  6. Royce Danckert says:
    2 years ago

    This whole exercise is a farce. The objective of this govt is to entrench 100% of advice in respect of superannuation and retirement into the sole domain of the industry super funds.
    Not to recognise this is to believe the earth is flat.

    Reply
  7. Anon says:
    2 years ago

    First tranche should save a grand total of 5cents for client advice fees. Or depending on insurance consents maybe even add cost.

    Reply
  8. anotheroldlifey says:
    2 years ago

    You would have to be a Rhodes Scholar to see where this is going.

    Reply
  9. FAAA Jones says:
    2 years ago

    What the he’ll are the FAAA doing? Advisers need actual reprieve from choking red tape. STEP UP AND DO SOMETHING FOR US

    Reply
  10. Over to us? says:
    2 years ago

    This will have no savings at all, the one thing real advisers all needed to see where soa changes. What a load of rot.

    Reply
  11. Feedback? says:
    2 years ago

    Interested parties GAVE feedback, in the interim qoar submissions the post qoar submissions, thousands have given feedback on ideas unchanged from the INTERIM report. The only feedback that is valid is that you have wasted over a year of thousands of advisers lives to again LET them DOWN 

    Reply
  12. Risk advice harder says:
    2 years ago

    So risk advice compliance just got MORE cumbersome. They people are both idiots and looking after the industry fund buddies. So dumb it’s embarrassing   the tiny amount of risk being written being made harder still = hellve lot more social security out of the coiffers 

    Reply
  13. Association absence says:
    2 years ago

    Why don’t the impotent Associations who profit from our profession advocate and do something?

    Reply
    • Mick Smith says:
      2 years ago

      Easy solution – cancel your membership

      Reply
  14. From: Jonesy To: Advisers says:
    2 years ago

    Gotcha. Yet, again.

    Reply
  15. Waste of oxygen says:
    2 years ago

    All the advisers I know were mainly interested in soa changes they were recommended to be scrapped all together why did we need to wait so long for this bs?

    Reply
  16. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    Until the Annual Fee Consent form is standardised to a one off form for ongoing adviser service support fees (as exists in every other international jurisdiction), over 2 million fund members will remain unable to access cost affordable financial advice. 

    Reply
  17. The Outspoken Adviser says:
    2 years ago

    I eagerly listened to a speaker from treasury, as he spoke with gusto on Financial Planning starting to become a profession. I was shocked to learn that after 15 years as a financial planner i was less a professional then a building apprentice. 
    See the Government is still applying pre royal commission corporate standards to traditional financial planning. 
    There is still a disconnect between the advice provided by a non aligned planner, compared to the vertical integration model ran by the likes of AMP.

    As i listened, i started to compare the our industry to others. 
    Who remembers GPs rorting Medicare ?
    – where is the fallout from these GPs? did any lose their practice?
    The rorts were estimated at $8b per annum!!!
    The banking royal commission confirmed a total remediation of $7.2b – total 

    so again i thought to myself, who else is out there that are professionals. 
    Then it occurred to me –  what about the construction and building industry?
    how many builders have gone bust in the last 12 months?
    what is the amount in unpaid debts 
    how many families are left to pick up the pieces of a partially completed home?
    how many families are left with a substandard home and have their building walking away from them. 
    – i had this happen to me in 2008. 

    When i started to do the math, i thought to myself – these professionals arent very professional, maybe we need a royal commission into the Health and Building Industry. 

    maybe we need a royal commission into those professionals called politicians. 

    its a can of worms that needs to be opened. 

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 years ago

      Did you not forget PWC?  Treasury also heavily involved?

      Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 years ago

      To get some perspective on how little knowledge consumers have now, I met a 30 yr old businessman from Adelaide recently who had never heard of AMP & had no idea what they did.   Says it all.  

      Reply
    • Joker says:
      2 years ago

      Professions are suppossed to be centred around ethics and professionalism…did you say Politicians and professionals in the same breath? haha

      Reply
    • EndRealestateComm says:
      2 years ago

      Inquiry into Real Estate commissions. Actually just real estate in general. Thats a true conflict and no risk on the agent at all. 

      Reply
      • Anonymous says:
        2 years ago

        100% – it’s a rort that still exists and is completely disconnected from the cumbersome and lengthy legislation that advisers have had to endure over the last 23 years. Most home owners have a large proportion of their wealth tied to their home but agents get away with rorting 2% on a sale transaction for little more than 3 weeks of being an agent. Australia and our conflicted laws are doomed. Canberra has so many conflicted Pollies owning Real Estate investment that they dare mess with any crackdown on agent’s commissions.

        Reply
  18. Jonesy’s Sad Joke says:
    2 years ago

    Jonesy‘s focus is 100000% focused on Industry Super conflicted sales advice via back packers  paid for via HIDDEN COMMISSIONS = Stage 2. 
    Real Advisers get a couple of crumbs. 
    REAL ADVISERS GET SCREWED YET AGAIN. 
    Not surprised, RC no. 2 drums get louder. 

    Reply
    • anon says:
      2 years ago

      are the industry funds employing back packers to give advice? 

      Reply
  19. Tim says:
    2 years ago

    What about the huge costs of PI Cover we all are paying !!!

    Reply
  20. Mick Smith says:
    2 years ago

    Get rid of the stupid annual renewals and FDS

    Reply
  21. Tennis match begins says:
    2 years ago

    Stephen this is a start but the cost of the ridiculous ASIC levy together with continuing red tape means our financial advice fees won’t be reducing just yet…Back to you.

    Reply
  22. Couldn't be this incompetent a says:
    2 years ago

    He’s reducing red tape but not changing SOA’s whilst not providing any clarity in relation to BID, which is where the red tape issues mostly arise?  I need a drink and then a change of career.  Another nail in the coffin of personal financial advice in this country.

    Reply
    • I'm out. says:
      2 years ago

      Yep – An unmitigated disgrace. Simply ridiculous. 

      Reply
    • Global Joke says:
      2 years ago

      It’s deliberate they want all real advisers out and to employ over paid grads to flog industry funds under the guise of Advice. Disgraceful 

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited