X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Investment firm left hanging on repayment

A Brisbane-based investment firm has indicated its former investment manager is still yet to cough up a repayment ordered by the Supreme Court in February.

by Staff Writer
June 12, 2020
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

John Bridgeman, which had been the exclusive investment manager for Benjamin Hornigold declared an intention to make an off-market bid for all of the securities in the latter firm last year, after it had previously made a bid in 2018. But the Takeovers Panel handed down a decision declaring unacceptable circumstances around the bid.

The management services agreement between John Bridgeman and Benjamin Hornigold was terminated in December. 

X

Benjamin Hornigold alerted the market that its former investment manager had failed to comply with the Takeovers Panel order to pay its costs incurred by the proceedings around the takeover bid of $120,000 plus GST.

In the first week of February, the Supreme Court made an order directing John Bridgeman to make two payments, including the takeover bid costs. 

By 12 February, Benjamin Hornigold had received $149,547.84 from John Bridgeman, one of the sums ordered by the court, but the remaining amount of $132,000, due by 17 February, was still outstanding. 

As signalled by Benjamin Hornigold on Wednesday, the firm’s former investment manager is still yet to make the payment.

On 21 May, in a response to an application from Benjamin Hornigold, the Supreme Court of Queensland issued an enforcement warrant to a financial institution with which John Bridgeman is said to hold certain known bank accounts. 

The warrant required the institution to transfer all amounts of the accounts to Benjamin Hornigold up to a total of $134,853.14 – the initial amount of the court order plus interest and costs.

But the warrant was returned “wholly unsatisfied”, with Benjamin Hornigold saying it understands that there were insufficient funds in the bank accounts held by John Bridgeman. 

Benjamin Hornigold said it is continuing to seek legal advice around the “avenues available” to recover the outstanding payment.

Tags: Investment

Related Posts

Image/Financial Services Council

Legislative fix for drafting error vital to avoid more adviser losses: FSC

by Keith Ford
November 12, 2025
0

The Financial Services Council has warned that unless an omnibus bill is passed before 1 January 2026, an “inadvertent drafting...

Clearer boundaries between different levels of support needed to help client outcomes

by Alex Driscoll
November 12, 2025
0

Touching on this issue on the ifa Show podcast, Andrew Gale and Stephen Huppert from the Actuaries Institute’s Help, Guidance...

Image: Who is Danny/stock.adobe.com

Open banking platform aims to provide advisers ‘verified financial truth’ for clients

by Keith Ford
November 12, 2025
0

Fintech platform WealthX is using its partnership with Padua to “bridge critical gaps between broking and advice” through a new...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited