X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Government welcomes feedback on ASIC funding model

The federal government is seeking stakeholder views on the ASIC funding model.

by Reporter
September 29, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The government has released a discussion paper after commencing the review of the ASIC industry funding model (IFM) in August.

Stakeholder feedback received through this process is set to inform the review’s consideration, including to consider whether any refinements are required to the IFM to ensure its settings remain appropriate.

X

The IFM was introduced in 2017, prior to which the corporate regulator was mainly funded by taxpayers.

The IFM comprises industry levies charged annually to entities across 52 industry sub-sectors, and fees-for-service charged to individual entities at the point of initiating certain regulatory services.

As part of the review, the government is welcoming feedback on the changes in levy amounts since the commencement of the IFM, among other things.

The government has found that since the commencement of the IFM, the amount recovered through levies has increased by $77.5 million or 33 per cent (as at 2020–21).

In particular, the government is seeking feedback from advisers on the possible creation of two sub-sectors (rather than the existing four) in the financial advice sector — with one sub-sector for licensees that provide personal advice to retail clients on relevant financial products and one sub-sector for licensees that do not provide personal advice.

Another method proposed by the review is the allocation of costs at a sector level (rather than sub-sector level) and the apportion of costs amongst entities using a generalised metric such as a volume-based proxy.

The government is also opening the floor up for debate by asking stakeholders whether there are other opportunities to simplify the design, structure and legislative framework for levies.

Moreover, questions relating to volatility in levies between different years include: “Is it more important to have less volatile/more stable levy amounts year-on-year, or more granular and equitable apportionment of costs each year?”; and “Are there other ways to manage or reduce volatility in levy amounts year-on-year, including other approaches to spreading costs? If so, why, and what benefits would it provide?”.

The current model was the subject of significant criticism from advice and accounting industry associations after the corporate regulator last year announced that levy costs for the 2020 financial year were set to rise by more than 60 per cent on earlier estimates.

Former treasurer Josh Frydenberg later announced “temporary and targeted relief” after ASIC’s 2020–21 Cost Recovery Implementation Statement estimated a per adviser levy of $3,138.

The government is welcoming feedback until 28 October 2022.

Related Posts

Image/Commonwealth Government

Mulino remains committed to ‘complicated’ DBFO reforms

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
4

Speaking at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Conference on the Gold Coast, Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino...

Advice reform legislation essential for positive results: HGA

by Alex Driscoll
November 13, 2025
0

Speaking on the ifa Show podcast Andrew Gale and Stephen Huppert from the Actuaries Institute’s Help, Guidance and Advice Working...

InterPrac, SQM Research hit with lawsuits over alleged Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
8

On Thursday morning, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced it has commenced civil penalty proceedings against InterPrac and...

Comments 2

  1. Waste of Money says:
    3 years ago

    …and ASIC’s loss in court to CFSIL/CBA ‘proudly’ funded by individual advisers…

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    Any commentary on how the levy will be offset by any settlements obtained through ASIC’s actions? Didn’t think so, the con is still on.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited