X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Formerly banned adviser to face further ASIC charges

A formerly banned adviser is set to face further court proceedings after ASIC claimed he was involved in other cases of misleading and deceptive conduct.

by Reporter
August 17, 2017
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a statement, ASIC announced it has successfully applied to the Federal Court to make Joshua Fuoco a fourth defendant in proceedings against advice licensee Wealth and Risk Management (WRM) and its related companies Yes FP and Yes FS.

Mr Fuoco is the owner of WRM, Yes FP and Yes FS and was the director of the three defendant companies until he was disqualified by ASIC from managing corporations for 2.5 years from 13 May 2016.

X

Mr Fuoco was also previously banned by ASIC from providing financial advice from 13 January 2010 to 12 January 2015. He then worked at WRM from 22 July 2015 to 7 October 2016, according to the ASIC adviser register.

ASIC alleges that Mr Fuoco was knowingly involved or concerned in various contraventions by WRM, Yes FP and Yes FS, including unconscionable conduct by WRM, Yes FP and Yes FS in contravention of section 12CB of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act.

ASIC also alleges Mr Fuoco was involved with the Yes FS firm carrying on an unlicensed financial services business in contravention of section 911A, alternatively 911B, of the Corporations Act.

Further, ASIC alleges that Mr Fuoco was involved in Yes FS’s misleading and deceptive representations in contravention of section 1041H of the Corporations Act and sections 12DA and 12DB(1)(f) of the ASIC Act, the statement said. 

On 8 August 2017, the court made new orders in the proceeding, including that the defendants are required to file their defence by 13 September 2017. The original trial date of 2 October 2017 has been vacated and the matter set down for trial on 1 February 2018.

 

Related Posts

Image: FAAA

FAAA wants auditors in the spotlight over Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
December 12, 2025
1

Speaking on a Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) webinar on Thursday, chief executive Sarah Abood said she was pleased to...

Expect a 2026 surge in self-licencing: MDS

by Alex Driscoll
December 12, 2025
0

The dominant story of 2025 in the advice world has undoubtably been ASIC’s suing of InterPrac due to the failure...

image: feng/stock.adobe.com

Adviser movement surges as year-end licensee switching accelerates

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
December 12, 2025
0

According to Padua Wealth Data’s latest weekly analysis, there was a net gain of five advisers in the week ending...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited