X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Former UGC and MWL adviser banned over advice connected to Shield

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who had advised clients to invest in the Shield Master Fund while at both United Global Capital and MWL Financial Services.

by Keeli Cambourne
October 23, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jovan Videkanic was banned from providing financial services, controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business or performing any function involved in the carrying on of a financial services business for seven years.

ASIC found that Videkanic gave inappropriate advice to certain clients which was not in their best interests between July 2020 and February 2024 to:

X
  • Establish a self-managed superannuation fund, rollover their existing superannuation into the SMSF and invest a significant portion of their retirement savings into the Global Capital Property Fund, a highly speculative investment when he was authorised by United Global Capital.
  • Invest most of their superannuation into the High Growth class or the Growth class of the Shield Master Fund which were high risk investments or the Balanced class which was a medium-high risk investment when he was authorised by MWL Financial Services.

ASIC also found that Videkanic’s statements of advice to certain clients contained false and misleading statements, implying they would enjoy better returns by investing their superannuation into Shield, including representations that Shield had a higher-performing track record against other super funds when Shield had only been in existence for a short period.

Videkanic was also a member of MWL’s investment committee. He was previously authorised by UGC from July 2020 to February 2022 and authorised by MWL from 7 February 2022.

ASIC was concerned that UGC and its representatives gave conflicted personal advice to clients, specifically those advised to establish a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) and invest in highly speculative investments related to UGC director Joel Hewish. This included a company called Global Capital Property Fund Limited (GCPF).

This is despite UGC advisers telling clients they were not receiving personal financial product advice.

The day after the banning order took effect on 26 August 2025, Videkanic lodged an application with the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) seeking a review of ASIC’s decision, as well as an application for a stay and confidentiality orders pending the outcome of the ART review.

On 17 October 2025, Videkanic withdrew his application for a stay and confidentiality orders in the ART. His review application with the ART remains ongoing.

Earlier this week, ASIC announced it had banned fellow MWL investment committee member Wade Spooner for eight years.

The announcements follow ASIC cancelling the Australian Financial Services licence of MWL Financial Services and banning director Nicholas Maikousis for 10 years over conduct in relation to the Shield Master Fund.

ASIC found MWL operated what it called a “low-cost advice project” from 2021 to receive referrals from telemarketers/lead generators and to recommend clients invest their superannuation in Shield. Between September 2021 and February 2024, MWL recommended Shield to more than 750 clients who collectively invested $155 million.

“Clients who seek advice from financial advisers should be able to trust that the advice they receive will be in their best interest. Failing to manage conflicts has the potential to cause consumers to be given financial product advice that may not suit their needs,” said ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court in August.

ASIC also banned the firm’s responsible manager and compliance manager, Robert John Tohill, from providing any financial services for five years.

“Mr Tohill commenced as compliance manager at MWL in December 2016 and was appointed as one of MWL’s responsible managers in December 2021,” ASIC said in a statement.

“Whilst at MWL, certain financial advisers provided personal financial product advice to consumers who invested in the Shield Master Fund.”

In cancelling MWL’s licence, ASIC required MWL to remain a member of AFCA until 25 August 2026.

MWL, Maikousis and Tohill have the right to apply to the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of ASIC’s decisions.

The action follows ASIC banning four MWL Financial Services advisers in July, beginning with Isaac Jacob McQueen and Matthew Simon Bradley for a period of four and eight years, respectively.

Later that month, ASIC announced it had banned MWL advisers Rocco D’Amelio and Robert Crossing from providing financial services for a period of seven and six years, respectively.

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 4

  1. Anonymous says:
    3 weeks ago

    Hopefully investors would be looking at taking civil action against these Ps

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 weeks ago

    Quite the toxic culture at UGC then MWL it seems, though no mention of First Guardian, who Videkanic also directed clients to from 2020 onwards. I do wonder when the contagion and blood letting will end – and victims, some now suffering real financial hardship, are recognised and made whole again. Otherwise the industry’s reputation will remain sullied.

    Reply
  3. Dixon's Bannings ? says:
    3 weeks ago

    Agree these people should be banned. 
    But
    ASIC, how come no advisers, Responsible Mngrs, etc have ever been banned from Dodgy Dixon’s ???? 

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      3 weeks ago

      And to what degree did the lack of meaningful action in relation to Dixons, embolden the Shield & First Guardian mob?

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited