X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

First QAR bill reforms put ‘onerous requirements’ on trustees

Proposed regulatory reforms should support super funds’ re-entry to advice but increased complexity has left some trustees feeling anxious, according to an industry veteran.

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
April 26, 2024
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Speaking at the Actuaries Institute’s Retirement Matters Fireside Chat this month, Andrew Gale, Australian Society for Progress & Wellness chairman and Gale Force Advisory owner, said the government’s Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) package of reforms stemming from the Quality of Advice Review (QAR) are a step in the right direction.

“A lot of that is good progress and, in particular, it should open up access to advice through superannuation, which is pretty critical. Some of the issues we saw is there’s currently a large gap between the demand for help, guidance and advice, and its availability,” Gale said.

X

“A lot of that is regulatory-driven complexity, which affects both financial advisers and superannuation funds and that’s part of what the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms are intended to address.

“Currently, only 10 to 15 per cent of people receive comprehensive advice and if we’re going to broaden the availability and, indeed, the affordability of advice, the role of superannuation funds is critical.”

Referring again to the DBFO reforms, Gale said although the proposed changes do address some of the issues in getting super funds back into advice, it also increased the complexity and has left some trustees cautious to return to advice.

“The next issue is uncertainty in terms of how the adviser regulation will be amended to both take account of the Quality of Advice Review, but in particular, the capacity of superannuation funds to be able to deliver on those additional freedoms,” he said.

“There’s still a dilemma for superannuation funds and trustees in terms of fulfilling the desire to give more advice, to service their membership, to fulfil their obligations under the retirement income covenant but all the while trying to navigate the vagaries of financial advice regulation.

“Understandably, that’s led to a degree of trustee caution up to now and there’s still a lot more progress to be made on that front. We even saw that with the legislation, which came out about a week and a half ago, which was meant to be streamlining amendments but still had some proposed additional onerous requirements for trustees.”

The first DBFO legislation outlines that a trustee is not required to agree to the member’s request to charge the relevant costs even when the requirements are satisfied.

“A trustee could decline the member’s request if, in their view, it does not relate to the member’s beneficial interest in the fund or if charging the cost would be inconsistent with the trustee’s other regulatory obligations,” the explanatory memorandum reads.

Financial Advice Association Australia (FAAA) chief executive Sarah Abood previously flagged that the group has “strong” concerns about these onerous additional processes.

“This legislation places specific obligations on them [super fund trustees] before advice fees can be paid (under a new sub-section, 99FA, of the Corporations Act). There is no clarity as to how these obligations will be met by trustees,” Abood said.

“The risk we see is that this could cause significant extra work for financial advisers who may be asked to provide additional specific documentation, such as statements of advice and invoices.”

According to Gale, reforms should also reflect Australians’ desire for more low-stakes guidance as well the provision of advice to accommodate those needing education more than product recommendations.

“The third component is looking beyond advice. So, a lot of the reforms have been focused on advice but, in many cases, people don’t want advice per se. They just want some simple guidance and direction on particular issues. This was an issue called out by the retirement income review,” he said.

“For a large portion of the population, the ability to just give guidance rather than advice, per se, would help a whole lot of people and certainly members of superannuation funds. We think there needs to be a much more robust HGA framework which could accommodate all that.”

Related Posts

Image/Financial Services Council

Legislative fix for drafting error vital to avoid more adviser losses: FSC

by Keith Ford
November 12, 2025
0

The Financial Services Council has warned that unless an omnibus bill is passed before 1 January 2026, an “inadvertent drafting...

Clearer boundaries between different levels of support needed to help client outcomes

by Alex Driscoll
November 12, 2025
0

Touching on this issue on the ifa Show podcast, Andrew Gale and Stephen Huppert from the Actuaries Institute’s Help, Guidance...

Image: Who is Danny/stock.adobe.com

Open banking platform aims to provide advisers ‘verified financial truth’ for clients

by Keith Ford
November 12, 2025
0

Fintech platform WealthX is using its partnership with Padua to “bridge critical gaps between broking and advice” through a new...

Comments 3

  1. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    I’d love the govt to provide an example of a ‘guidance’ conversation v an advice conversation. How does guidance compare to general advice?? If only they could stop giving fluffy high level concept answers and actually be direct.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    Jones is the worst financial services minister to date. And that’s saying something given the respective peers have killed advice in Australia while other countries have supported the benefits Advice proves. Utter embarrassment. Hilarious it accidentally affected Industry funds and General insurance. Like objectivity through ineptitude when trying to do the opposite. Special kind of incapable…

    Reply
  3. Ropeable says:
    2 years ago

    The Govt have absolutely no idea about how to make advice more accessible but at an affordable cost to the consumer.
    They are making advice more complex, more convoluted and more costly than ever before….if that is at all possible.
    They are failing dismally.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited