X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Fee-for-no-service breaches see licensee director banned

The corporate regulator has continued its action related to Lighthouse Partners, banning a former director of its licensee for failing to adequately address fees-for-no-service conduct.

by Laura Dew
October 30, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Brendan Rodwell was a director at Crown Wealth Group, but ASIC said it had reason to believe he was not adequately trained or competent to perform functions in or control a financial services business after failing to adequately address fees-for-no-service (FFNS) conduct by Lighthouse Partners, one of Crown Wealth’s representatives.

Lighthouse Partners was a corporate authorised representative of Crown Wealth Group between 16 August 2018 and 4 April 2023. On 13 March 2024, ASIC cancelled Crown Wealth Group’s Australian Financial Services Licence after it was placed into voluntary administration.

X

ASIC said it was satisfied that Rodwell’s conduct was the “result of carelessness and inadvertence rather than a deliberate course of action to conceal or disregard the FFNS conduct”.

He has been banned from performing any function involved in carrying on a financial services business, and from controlling an entity that carries on a financial services business, for two years.

More specifically, ASIC found that Rodwell, as a director of Crown Wealth:

  • Failed to take proactive steps to ensure Crown Wealth complied with its obligation to report the FFNS conduct to ASIC as a reportable situation within 30 days after becoming aware of it. Crown Wealth did not lodge a reportable situation with ASIC until six months after becoming aware of the FFNS conduct.
  • Did not take adequate steps to confirm that the FFNS conduct was properly investigated and affected clients were properly remediated.
  • Took a misguided approach that he could remain within his perceived operational responsibilities (which did not involve direct client contact or the provision of financial advice) rather than involve himself in the compliance and reporting obligations of Crown Wealth, and that his inaction and inattentiveness to these obligations were a serious lapse in judgement.
  • Demonstrated a lack of professionalism and competence, and a failure to act with the diligence expected of a director of a financial services licensee.

The banning took effect from 23 October 2025 and has been recorded on ASIC’s banned and disqualified register.

He has the right to appeal to the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of ASIC’s decision.

This is the fourth individual action taken in regard to Crown Wealth and Lighthouse Partners.

In July, ASIC announced it had banned director, shareholder and financial adviser of Lighthouse Partners Kiriley Roper (also known as Kiriley Suckling) from providing financial services for 10 years.

The regulator also banned Andrew Moore, who was previously a director, responsible manager and head of compliance at Crown Wealth Group, for three years.

Earlier this month, ASIC banned former Lighthouse Partners financial adviser and director Timothy Archibald from providing financial services for 10 years.

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 2

  1. Anonymous says:
    2 weeks ago

    I categorically reject ASIC’s decision and the basis upon which the banning order has been issued.

    Crown AFSL spent significant resources and costs— in excess of several hundred thousand dollars — defending what was, at its core, a technical breach reporting matter. The issue related to a small number of administrative cases out of approximately 15,000 serviced across our national network of around 50 advisers. Importantly, no clients suffered any financial loss.

    Despite our consistent record of compliance and cooperation, ASIC chose to escalate this issue in a way that appears disproportionate to its substance. Based on our experience, the regulator engaged legal and barrister resources several times greater than ours — likely spending multiples of what we did — to pursue a matter that had no consumer detriment and which we worked transparently to resolve.

    At the very same time ASIC dedicated countless hours and taxpayer-funded resources — including adviser levy contributions — to chasing our small AFSL over technicalities, the regulator appeared to have taken its eye off far more significant failures. Large-scale collapses such as the First Guardian Master Fund and the Shield Master Fund, together resulting in losses exceeding $1 billion to tens of thousands of Australian investors, demonstrate where the regulator’s focus should have been.

    Every adviser under Crown AFSL can attest that we operated with transparency, integrity, and strict adherence to process. Our focus was always on protecting clients and ensuring compliant advice — the hallmarks of a responsible licensee.

    This experience highlights the urgent need for greater transparency and proportionality in regulatory decision-making. Enforcement should focus on genuine misconduct and systemic risk — not technicalities that destroy reputations and livelihoods while failing to protect a single investor.

    I remain proud of the culture and standards we upheld at Crown AFSL and continue to advocate for balanced, accountable regulation that genuinely serves the best interests of Australian consumers and advisers alike.

    Brendan

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      2 weeks ago

      I’m not surprised one bit. ASIC are a disgraceful, ideologically driven organisation. Their staff have a massive chip on their shoulder. They are jealous of financial advisers and the private sector in general. They do everything they can to wrap us up in red-tape to destroy productivity in our sector. They are raving lefties who believe every Australian should have their super invested in a left-wing, union-controlled super fund. ASIC is the poster child of everything that is wrong in our country, with bloated bureaucracies strangling every part of our society, driving up inflation and damaging our prosperity. 

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited