Let’s look at some of the things the Liberal Party has supported in recent history, starting with the most recent, the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry.
The royal commission is exactly what it says it is – an investigation into misconduct. It focuses on the small percentage of the industry that is doing the wrong thing and ignores, as does the government and media commentary, the majority that is doing the right thing.
While there is no argument that the wrongs of the industry must be righted, this is an industry that, just for starters, paid out over $9 billion in life insurance claims in 2016 to over 108,000 people according to The Risk Store. This translates to over $26 million per day in lump sum payments.
Many of these claims were a result of the fact that a financial adviser, usually a small business owner, recommended that a client buy life insurance to protect their most important asset – themselves. Every dollar that is paid out via a life insurance claim is potentially a dollar saved by the government in the form of welfare payments.
Now let’s look at the Life Insurance Framework (LIF). LIF reduced adviser commissions by up to 50 per cent following arguments that included that such a move would make life insurance more affordable, improve take up of policies and therefore help relieve Australia’s welfare debt. In reality, premiums have risen since LIF, which must only serve to prove those arguments false.
Then there’s the new ASIC ‘industry funding fee’ purported to be in the region of $1,500 per adviser, per annum, due to be charged from January 2019. I have several problems with this. The first is the nomenclature – let’s call this what it is; a tax on licensees, who have no choice but to pass it on, and therefore, by extension, a tax on small business advice practices.
The second is there has been no confirmation on exactly how much the tax is actually going to be. It is almost December and we are expected to start paying from January – how does a business forward plan for a tax as expensive as this (potentially around $750,000 a year for a licensee the size of Synchron) with such scant information?
The third and perhaps the most important is why there needs to be a tax at all. According to a submission to the royal commission, reported by The Australian, a former ASIC executive officer, Richard Harrison, revealed that in the period 2004-2014, ASIC raked in a staggering $4 billion plus, mostly collected from small business and the public. Most of this money went into the federal government coffer. Why doesn’t the government channel a bit more of the profits it makes via ASIC’s collection of money from small business and the general public into appropriately funding what ASIC is supposed to do – i.e. supervise the industry?
But all of these issues are quite macro. I have not yet even scratched the surface of the myriad micro things the Liberal Party government has supported that profoundly affect the ability of financial advisers to run businesses that can support them, their families and their staff, and provide meaningful service to their clients. To cite just one example, let’s look at the changes to superannuation.
The Liberal government has made changes that mean you can’t make more than $25,000 in concessional contributions a year. To add insult to injury, the government has imposed a $1.6 million transfer cap that limits the amount of money you can transfer to pension phase, although you can leave more than $1.6 million in the accumulation account and pay 15 per cent tax. In other words, if by some happy circumstance you have more than $1.6 million to retire on, the government will tax you.
There are around 25,000 financial advisers providing advice to Australians on matters such as superannuation and retirement planning. As the pool of superannuation under management approaches $3 trillion, I acknowledge that Australians should have access to financial planners who are:
- Ethical;
- Experienced;
- Appropriately qualified; and
- Committed to putting the interests of their client first.
Yet the Liberal Party government has done almost nothing over its successive terms in office to encourage or support financial advisers or the clients that depend on them.
Once upon a time, business owners voted Liberal in the belief that it was more supportive of business than the Labor Party. As time moved on, business owners voted Liberal in the belief that while the Liberal Party was no longer overly supportive of business, to vote Labor would be worse. Recent times have proven that neither of these two beliefs ring true anymore.
According to ASIC, small businesses account for around 96 per cent of all businesses in Australia, employ around half of our workforce and make up around 20 per cent of our gross domestic product. The Australian Industry and Skills Committee reports that in 2017, financial services was the second biggest industry in the country, employing over 400,000 people and touching the lives of most people.
Measures that affect small businesses and the financial services industry profoundly impact on almost every adult Australian – and whatever way politicians care to look at it, that’s a lot of voters.
Michael Harrison, chair, Synchron




One reason why I will NOT vote for Liberal is because they have forced NBN on me and forcefully removed my phone line. If you are a NBN user, I am sure you will do the same.
Clive Palmer anyone? Would be interested to know his policies on FP businesses…He knows the major parties are on the nose…
Vote Australian Conservatives in the Senate and they’ll keep common sense in politics regardless whether it’s lib or lab in the the lower.
Or you could just drink directly from the toilet. You would get the same feeling and outcome.
A bit rich coming from an AFSL being investigated by ASIC for taking on advisers Dover dismissed on compliance grounds. Dover says “non-compliant. Goodbye.” Synchron says “non-compliant: Hello”
Time better spent ensuring on-boarding processes are in shape Don.
Self interest is everywhere. There is no love for us due to the actions of a few cowboys, not to mention the conflicts that have drived poor outcomes for clients. Labor / Libs, or dumb and dumber. We are screwed
Well, you could vote Donkey, but they’re already in power. The Asses are no better. That just leaves King Julien and the Fossa!
Voting informal is looking like the winner right now…
So Lib’s aren’t worth the vote, do you think Shorten or Bowen are our friends or a better option? Hell no! If there was a minor party that would be friendly then maybe we have an option, but the greens hate us and none of the rest appear to have our backs….
Maybe Synchron or one of the other groups should be starting their own party, pretty sure you’d get around that 400,000 vote mark (and before you say it’s too hard, if Pauline Hanson can do it, anyone can!)
Vote Labor at your own peril – they gave us FOFA and Bowen has been very clear in what he intends to do FOFA the industry with Version . Why isn’t the industry doing what it should be doing and supporting the changes rather than this rubbish and gutter writing – if you think Labor is a better option – good luck to you
Where does it say vote Labor? The article points out how the Liberals have added taxes for no benefit.
So Anon, your alternative to Lib or Labour is???????????
If 96% of all businesses employ half the workforce to produce 20% of GDP, then maybe these small businesses should get out of the way of the part of the economy that is productive.
you sound like a Labor supporter
Actually, no. Just suggesting that throwing a bunch of numbers into a paragraph without realising what they are saying is pretty silly. A bit like the rest of the article.
You must have missed the bit that said small business employed 50% of all employed Australians…..Maybe we can close down all those small businesses and go and work for a company that’s in the other 80%….dont know if they can take up all those people though….
I cant agree with all the comments as i find the writing quite political, one or two areas i do agree with. but the paragraph re the payment of claims i find stupefying in that… why get a pat on the back for paying a claim, its what the client took out insurance for, that doesn’t mean advisers are fantastic, it is not an aberration of action, it is just what should happen pertaining to all disclosure being correct.
Advisers have had it too good for too long, imho. Fee for service only, take out commission and trail altogether, lets get the client to pay for the advice he receives WHEN they receive it.
We live in the dark ages still and there is so much push against change.
Clearly you’re a little slow on the uptake, he’s not patting them on the back for paying the claim but for the adviser who ensured they had a decent insurance policy in the first place that would pay the claim.
Mind you, with the rest of your comments I do truly appreciate how you manage to display that your mind isn’t only thick but narrow at the same time, most impressive.
These “Authorities”, “Commissions”, “Boards” and other “BureauCrapAcademic” parasites are now designed as “Revenue Gathering Institutions” [RGI], where previously they were funded by taxation and Government budgets.
Today, they are “Self Funding”, positive revenue contributors to Consolidated Revenue, based on the flaccid and irrational excuse that they should be funded by “Those who require regulation”, AS IF THE ENTIRE ECONOMY AND SOCIETY ITSELF DOESN’T BENEFIT FROM A STABLE, ORGANISED, GENERALLY LAW ABIDING MARKET SEGMENT.
This is inherently unfair, imbalanced, and contravenes the basic philosophies of democracy, good governance, and uniform taxation policy.
Essentially Scott Morrison [and many other corrupt politicians at all levels] have “discovered” the repetitive methodology of SHIFTING COSTS OUT OF THE BUDGET on to private shoulders – TAXATION BY STEALTH, and abusing a specific portion of society, not to mention making them “Profit Centres”.
Much like State Governments, Telecommunications, and Energy Suppliers have set up “Supply” and/or “Network” Charges instead of charging purely for consumption, we are now being ushered by the Federal Government into an era of crushing Bureaucratic Totalitarianism, and inevitably, dictatorship.
No one talks about reducing Government costs and increasing efficiency – only how to gouge out more and more from already overstretched taxpayers. Ever more Fines, Fees, Levies, Charges…
BTW, to the best of my knowledge, the majority of “Job creation” politicians trumpet about is in the “Public Service” – who do you think are now manning the Call Centres, if not largely new immigrants?
All the newer entities such as FASEA, like the TPB are doing their absolute best to create for themselves a permanent, extended operational and supervisory role, despite the mushroom like multiplication and overlap of Regulators.
This is Basic Bloated Bureaucratic and Organisational Behaviour, typical of the over regulated, vastly intrusive, costly, and excessive QANGO and Government regulatory landscape in Australia. it needs to be stopped.
There is already a subterranean Civil War in Australia – Governments and the “Public Disservice” against the Citizen – it is only a question of how violent it is going to get.
When the citizenry starts to rebel, it will be ugly.
Well done Anonymous. I think you should be Prime Minister. Your summary is perfect!
I agree Michael. The Labor party will also have a huge financial effect on self funded retirees and those who negatively fear and everyone who makes a capital gain. Who do we vote for?
Over Bloody Complicated O’Dwyer and her Treasury / ATO Buffoons will be long remembered for the disasters to Super and Financial Advisers.
A complete wrecking ball to IFA’s and Small business and enough to make a life long LMP voter, from a family of life long LNP voters to change to ….. the other side, i cant even say it but i’m so very tempted after this LNP debacle.
Spot on. The liberal Party are simply not worthy of any votes. They have ignored small business, and financial advisers in particular.
Well said
Well done Michael – finally, someone has the courage to hit back at regulators and government. More voices should be heard explaining the unintended consequences of over-regulation!