X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

E&P, Dixon Advisory class action settles for $16m

A class action alleging financial advisers gave unsuitable advice and failed to address conflicts of interest has settled for $16 million.

by Naomi Neilson
November 16, 2023
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Shine Lawyers, representing the class action, said a conditional settlement has been reached between E&P Financial Group and the estimated 4,000 customers allegedly affected by the adviser’s conduct.

The settlement was reached without admission of liability and is now subject to court approval.

X

The class action alleged E&P advisers, working under the Dixon Advisory Superannuation Service (DASS) – which went into liquidation in January last year – gave unsuitable advice that did not reflect their clients’ needs or their financial circumstances.

It was also alleged the advice was not in the clients’ best interests and, when there was a conflict, it was not adequately addressed.

In addition to E&P Financial and DASS, the proceedings were brought against former chief executive Alan Dixon and former director Christopher Brown.

The affected clients will retain the ability to make a claim with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority or financial services compensation of last resort.

“We are pleased to have been able to reach a conclusion in this class action for group members subject to the court’s approval, and that group members will retain their rights to bring a claim against DASS, pursuant to the financial compensation scheme of last resort,” Shine Lawyers’ head of class actions, Vicky Antzoulatos, said.

Separate action filed by Piper Alderman which was stayed pending the resolution of Shine Lawyer’s proceedings, has been dismissed.

Last year, the Federal Court imposed a $7.2 million penalty on Dixon Advisory over its investment advice.

The court found that on 53 occasions between October 2015 and May 2019, Dixon Advisory was the responsible licensee of six representatives who did not act in the best interests of eight clients when they advised these clients to acquire, roll over or retain interests in the US Masters Residential Property Fund (URF) and URF-related products.

Representatives of Dixon Advisory were also found to have failed to conduct a “reasonable investigation” of the clients’ circumstances before providing advice.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) still has an active lawsuit against a former director of Dixon Advisory, Paul Ryan, for alleged breaches of directors’ duties.

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said in August this year: “Directors have responsibilities under the law to act in the best interests of their company, and this includes considering the interests of creditors when the company is facing insolvency.

“The creditors included thousands of financial advice clients who had invested in the US Masters Residential Property Fund and financial products operated by entities related to Dixon Advisory. These creditors suffered significant losses.”

Dixon Advisory previously held an Australian Financial Services Licence and operated a financial advice business focused on providing financial advice, investment advice, portfolio management, and superannuation administration services to retail clients.

The company filed for voluntary administration in January last year, with E&P Financial Group directors saying at the time that it “determined that mounting and actual potential liabilities mean it is likely to become insolvent at some future time”.

Related Posts

TAL launches FASEA credits for Risk Academy

ASIC releases November adviser exam results

by Alex Driscoll
December 5, 2025
0

The November exam was sat by 308 people and had a pass mark of 67.5 per cent, representing 208 people....

image: feng/stock.adobe.com

Adviser numbers see steep drop in first week of December

by Shy Ann Arkinstall
December 5, 2025
0

The week ending 4 December saw a net loss of 32 advisers after two months of almost exclusively single-digit shifts,...

Financial shyness and embarrassment holding back Australians

by Alex Driscoll
December 5, 2025
0

In a time where financial stress is weighing heavier on the average Australian, advisers offer a valuable service to many...

Comments 1

  1. Anon says:
    2 years ago

    $4,000 per claimant (before Shine take their fees) seems woefully small given alot of them (judging by the ones i have seen) have lost 20 or 50* this amount.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Mortgage-backed securities offering the home advantage

Domestic credit spreads have tightened markedly since US Liberation Day on 2 April, buoyed by US trade deal announcements between...

by VanEck
December 3, 2025
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited