X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home Opinion

Court verdict brings hope for advisers

Op-Ed The culmination of the class action filed against AMP has brought a much-needed sense of relief to advisers who have fought tirelessly for justice and recognition over the course of several years.

by Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
July 7, 2023
in Opinion
Reading Time: 5 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Almost four years ago, on 8 August 2019, AMP announced it intended to cull its adviser network and slash the amount it would pay under its buyer of last resort (BOLR) terms to exiting advisers from four times recurring revenue to a maximum of 2.5 times.

Its grandfather revenue plan was also changed from four times to 1.42 times, with a further plan to continue reducing the figure per month until it reached zero by January 2021.

X

Just over a year earlier, AMP Financial Planning’s (AMPFP) then-managing director met with AMP practices around Australia to reassure them that prevailing BOLR terms would remain the same.

Given this reassurance, numerous practices are presumed to have chosen to remain with AMP instead of exercising their BOLR rights in 2018.

Once regarded with reverence by the industry, these BOLR rights provided exiting advisers with the prospect of unburdening their client books for substantial sums, seemingly capable of supporting a comfortable retirement.

The inherent issue with the BOLR agreement was its provision of complete market control to the institution. AMP, as the owner of the clients, held the authority to determine the price, effectively deciding the value of an adviser’s business. Moreover, the adviser’s business served primarily as a means of promoting the wealth manager’s various tools and offerings — a point reinforced by the royal commission.

However, the year 2019 brought not only financial hardships but also inflicted a substantial mental burden upon the advisers.

At the time changes to the contractual relationship between AMPFP and the financial planning practices in its network were made, the network consisted of 542 practices.

In addition to contradicting its earlier assurance by implementing this change, AMP also faced allegations in 2020 of weaponising the BOLR audit process.

At the time, the head of AMP’s financial planner association, Neil Macdonald, said the wealth giant was not allowing a proper appeals process for advisers failing exit audits that could cost them millions of dollars in business values and potentially deem them ineligible for the class action.

The terms of advisers’ BOLR contracts meant AMP reserved the right to pay nothing for an adviser’s client book in some circumstances where a high percentage of their client files had failed an exit audit.

When confronted with inquiries about the hardships experienced by advisers, AMP’s chief executive officer Francesco De Ferrari asserted to the House of Representatives standing committee on economics that the actions taken by AMP were not only legally justified but also ethically sound.

On many occasions, Mr De Ferrari and the AMP team cited the royal commission and the resulting significant economic changes and disruptions across the industry as drivers for the giant’s “necessary” changes.

They argued that the original BOLR agreement was not financially viable and required revision.

The extent of the suffering inflicted upon advisers by these changes is truly distressing. Numerous advisers, in interviews with ifa, revealed they had contemplated self-harm during that period. Many of them harboured feelings of self-blame for their decision to join the company and for placing their trust in AMP’s promises.

Expressions of relief, brought on by Wednesday’s verdict, inundated ifa’s comments section this week, emphasising the profound significance of the decision.

“Great outcome, and nearly the end of the nightmare, which has hopefully saved a number of planners’ lives,” one reader said.

“I’m grateful that justice has prevailed,” another added.

While a third said: “How great is the decision, we paid lots of money to buy books from AMP, now at least we might get some money back”.

The battle, however, may not be over just yet, with AMP yet to confirm whether it intends to appeal the court’s decision.

Rightly so, some advisers remain sceptical, fearing another prolonged legal process.

“AMP executives like many other major institutional businesses houses just recklessly ruined the lives of many advisers. While the decision is positive, it will never heal the pain caused to many. If AMP as a company and those that control it have any decency, they should finalise this matter as soon as possible so that shattered lives can start the step of trying to heal,” one reader said.

Another aptly added: “Great outcome, and nearly the end of the nightmare, which has hopefully saved a number of planners lives. Planners who had been financially destroyed and were struggling to find a way out. Remember, if you are struggling mentally reach out and ask for help or contact Beyond Blue or Lifeline”.

Together with the advice community, ifa supports a prompt resolution to the matter and justice for the wronged advisers.

If you are suffering from depression, anxiety or suicidal thoughts, or you’re worried about someone else and feel that urgent professional support is needed, contact your local doctor or one of the 24/7 crisis agencies below:

Beyond Blue: 1300 22 4636 https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

Lifeline: 13 11 14 https://www.lifeline.org.au/

Suicide Call Back Service: 1300 659 467 www.suicidecallbackservice.org.au

Tags: Advisers

Related Posts

Why we must be optimistic about the barriers to advice

by Neil Rogan
November 10, 2025
0

Financial advice in Australia is often perceived as something people hesitate to engage with, however there is cause for greater...

The rise of model portfolios: Global trends and developments

by Kathleen Gallagher and Sinead Schaffer
November 3, 2025
0

Model portfolios have shifted from niche to mainstream, both in the US and Australia, marking a major change in the...

Fund manager ratings: Why due diligence is key, even on ratings houses

by Chris Gosselin
October 27, 2025
3

Fund research and fund ratings are intended to be detailed qualitative assessments used by the key parties in the fund...

Comments 1

  1. Anonymous says:
    2 years ago

    Well said Maja!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited