Speaking on IMAP’s Independent Thought podcast series, Marin Wealth managing director Pedro Marin Ramirez explained how his firm is currently using artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in writing proposals, letters of engagement and file notes, reducing the administrative burden and freeing up advisers’ time.
“We are able, instead of what used to take me probably 45 minutes to write an actual file note, it takes around maybe two to three minutes. So, the efficiencies are there,” Ramirez said.
When it comes to using AI in the financial advice industry, there are certainly some risks, largely in consideration to the highly sensitive nature of the information of which advisers are privy to, leading some licensees to take a more hesitant approach to AI.
However, Ramirez said that being self-licensed has allowed his business to take on the risk component of using AI, providing the opportunity to dictate the use of this technology as seen fit for the business.
“One of the inefficiencies is the fact that the licensing system, it’s based on how much risk the licence is willing to take. And because AI moves so fast, we don’t know a whole bunch of things [about] it, some licensees will not touch that,” he said.
“And I do have to disagree with that to a degree, because they’re worried about sensitive data. But what is sensitive data? Your religion, your health, your address, your mobile phone?
“There’s probably some sensitive data that would never be in a file note. The file note is more about strategy … Even if we send out an engagement proposal, it’s very general.”
Ramirez suggested that if current proposed legislation was to be passed that would see the removal of statements of advice to be replaced by letters of engagement and records of advice (ROAs), coupled with the use of AI, advisers would be able to increase their client capacity considerably.
“I think technology will help us massively scale up. So, I would consider 200–250 clients per adviser will be the norm because of how easy it would be for us to trade, how easy it will be for us to engage,” he said.
“Because, if you have a database of strategies, which could be endless, you can just tell AI, ‘Hey, this is the strategy I’m thinking. This is the amount. This is the research that backs it up. I just need you to write it. I need you to write that ROA’.”
He explained that this method would see advisers still completing the relevant research for the documents while relieving them of the need to actually write and edit said documents, saving them several hours per client.
“I think, five years from now will be a completely different scenario from the absorption of AI,” Ramirez said.
While recognising the potential of AI to enhance advisers’ processes, Liberal MP Bert van Manen noted the need for greater regulatory clarity in order for the industry to reap the full benefits of incoming technology.
“I think there are some tremendous opportunities Pedro has just touched on with AI, but if we make the regulatory environment clearer and more transparent, the opportunity to use AI becomes even more relevant,” van Manen said.
Though, he also reminded advisers of the importance of maintaining the personal aspects of their client interactions.
“At the end of the day, we can use all of the technology we like in the world, but I still think it comes down to a personal relationship with a client, and we should never, ever dismiss the value of that,” van Manen said.
“That personal relationship, AI will never replace that, because when you’re sitting across the table from somebody, and you can see their facial expression or their tone of speech, and you have a discussion, you can pick things up in that that may lead to you asking a question that they hadn’t even thought about themselves.
“That’s the value of the personal relationship.”




It’s impressive how quickly technology is advancing. For those who believe that file notes can’t be completed in just 3 minutes with AI, it’s time to embrace upskilling in IT or exploring new opportunities. Adapting to these changes will be essential to staying relevant in the evolving workplace.
3 minutes to write a file not. What BS.
Easily done with a accurate transcription service that has AI attached to it. Basically just adding a bit more fluff and boldening headers and you’re golden.
My file notes are generally done in under five minutes
100% true. We generate file notes and meeting summaries along with draft emails to clients across Initial Discovery, Fact Find, SoA presentation and Review meeting within 1-3 minutes.
Try Paradino AI
Dear Mr. van Manen,
Thank you for your thoughtful insights on the IMAP Independent Thought podcast series. Your emphasis on the value of personal client relationships is both timeless and fundamental to financial advice. I agree that human connection, interpreting tone, facial expressions, and subtle cues, is irreplaceable.
However, I’d like to remind you of the untapped potential AI offers in enhancing (not replacing) this engagement. Imagine receiving a brief 60 minutes before a client meeting, generated by AI from past file notes and meeting transcripts, reminding you of a 40th wedding anniversary, a client’s golf handicap goal, or their grandson’s graduation. These insights allow advisers to deepen relationships and truly “know your client.”
Pedro Marin Ramirez’s example illustrates how AI can streamline proposals, letters of engagement, and file notes, freeing advisers to focus on higher-value interactions. By leveraging AI for efficiency while preserving personal relationships, advisers can scale without compromise. With clearer regulatory frameworks, as you suggest, we could unlock even greater opportunities.
I appreciate your balanced approach and look forward to shaping a future where technology and relationships complement each other seamlessly.
Mark Lewin
Yeah ai won’t do this. Better as a draft framework or expand on previously verified info not to take conversational cues and social insights from mass data. Decades awaay
Average client base per adviser is 500-600 at the firm I work at (I’m just a lowly Paraplanner)!
Fair effort!!!
That’s either amazing, bumped up by risk only, or you’re counting a partnership as 2 clients. Or just insanely non compliant
I call BS