X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home Risk

Consumer protections rise under FSC Life Insurance Code

Further consumer protections will be included in the new Life Insurance Code of Practice.

by Reporter
October 26, 2022
in Risk
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has confirmed further consumer protections will be included in the new Life Insurance Code of Practice, including guidelines on family and domestic violence as well as new protections in the genetics moratorium. 

Under the new Life Code, life insurers would be required to develop and publish their policy on supporting people experiencing family and domestic violence from 1 July 2023.

X

The Moratorium on Genetic Tests would also be extended indefinitely and included in the new Life Code.

“The FSC is committed to improving consumer outcomes across the life insurance industry, especially for vulnerable people,” said FSC chief executive, Blake Briggs.

“These guidelines will help industry navigate this difficult and sensitive area, and bring a degree of consistency in how industry supports people experiencing family and domestic violence.” 

Mr Briggs also explained that the FSC and life insurance industry would give immunity to any genetic test taken while the Moratorium on Genetic Tests is in place, meaning that consumers would be able to undergo a genetic test without fear that the result could stop them from taking out life insurance. 

“Extending the moratorium with immunity means consumers who are tested now will never need to share their genetic test results with their life insurer and so won’t be declined for life insurance later,” Mr Briggs concluded.

Related Posts

HUB24 to launch lifetime retirement solution with TAL

by Alex Driscoll
November 12, 2025
0

TAL and HUB24 claim that the solution will enable “advisers to deliver their clients greater financial confidence and security throughout...

Safety net begins to fray as mental health and money pressure hits: CALI

by Alex Driscoll
November 5, 2025
0

Independent research commissioned by the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) has highlighted that Australians across the board are feeling...

Nippon Life finalises Acenda Group merger

by Keith Ford
October 31, 2025
1

Japanese life insurance giant Nippon Life has completed its acquisition of Resolution Life, with the newly formed Acenda Group now...

Comments 4

  1. Underwriter says:
    3 years ago

    [b]Insurers can ask for test results in some circumstances:[/b]

    As part of the application process for the benefits listed below, insurers may only ask for or use the results of a Genetic Test if the total amount of over you would have – including both the Insurance being applied for and any existing individual and group insurance with all life insurers – is more than any of the following:
    i) $500,000 of lump sum death Insurance
    ii) $500,000 of total permanent disability (TPD) Insurance
    iii) $200,000 of trauma and/or critical illness Insurance
    iv) $4,000 a month of any combination of income protection, salary continuance or business expenses Insurance.
    If the total amount of Insurance exceeds any of the limits above, insurers may ask for and use the
    result of a previously taken Genetic Test or planned test when assessing the full amount of Insurance being
    applied for across all types. A planned test means a person has consented to a Genetic Test. Insurers can do this
    provided that an evidence base shows that the test has relevance to the Insurance applied for, in line with the
    Disability Discrimination Act.

    Reply
  2. Doctor Phil says:
    3 years ago

    I thought there was a new association representing the life insurers.
    FSC represents the banks and should stick to their patch.

    Reply
  3. Anon says:
    3 years ago

    The FSC continues to display a lack of understanding of the issues impacting the life industry.
    After years of losing money and supposedly a big focus on sustainability, how can the FSC agree to support this anti-selection “indefinitely”?
    I expect the FSC will say that it’s about consumer protection. What about the consumers who never claim who will pay for this via higher claims. Where is their protection?

    Reply
  4. Tired lad says:
    3 years ago

    So now we are marriage guidance counselors/social workers too? Will this affect our PI?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited