X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

CBA faces money laundering allegations

CBA is facing a civil court case after AUSTRAC accused the bank of failing to properly monitor millions of dollars in cash deposited via its ‘intelligent deposit machines’.

by Reporter
August 4, 2017
in News
Reading Time: 1 min read

AUSTRAC has accused CBA of 53,700 contraventions of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML/CTF) regarding the use of the bank’s intelligent deposit machines (IDMs).

In a ‘concise statement’ filed in the Federal Court, AUSTRAC said the bank’s IDMs are capable of accepting 200 notes per deposit, or up to $20,000 per cash transaction.

X

CBA does not limit the number of IDM transactions a customer can make in one day, and deposits using the machines are instantly credited to the recipient’s account, the statement said.

AUSTRAC said IDMs facilitate anonymous cash deposits, because a card from any financial institution can be used to activate the machine.
The government agency said CBA failed to carry out an AML/CTF risk assessment prior to rolling out the IDMs, nor after it witnessed an “exponential rise in cash deposits through IDMs”.

In its filing, AUSTRAC included details of four criminal syndicates that used CBA’s IDMs to make millions of dollars in cash transactions.

“CBA failed to give 53,506 threshold transaction reports to AUSTRAC on time for cash transactions of $10,000 or more through IDMs from November 2012 to September 2015,” said AUSTRAC.

“AUSTRAC alleges that the bank failed to report suspicious matters either on time or at all involving transactions totalling over $77 million.”

 

 

Related Posts

Image: IFPA

A tale of two balances: IFPA says $3m super tax ‘integrity’ measure unfair

by Keith Ford
January 21, 2026
0

The total super balance integrity measure is shaping up as the main area of contention in the reshaped Division 296...

HUB24 boosts adviser numbers, bringing super trustee in-house

by Keith Ford
January 21, 2026
0

In an ASX announcement on Tuesday, HUB24 announced that there are now 5,277 financial advisers using the platform, up 8...

Image: cherdchai/stock.adobe.com

ETF use deepens across adviser portfolios as adoption reaches record levels

by Alex Driscoll
January 21, 2026
0

The 2025 Betashares/Investment Trends ETF Adviser Report found 73 per cent of advisers now utilise ETFs in client portfolios, the highest...

Comments 5

  1. ray says:
    8 years ago

    we cannot possibly have the big Aussie bank pay a massive deserved compensation. that would have an effect on the economy and peoples finances and lives will be destroyed…..oh that’s right this has already been happening for a very long time under the CBA banner.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    I can’t believe the idiocy that allowed this to occur. Surely somebody involved in the set up of these IDMs stopped to scratch their head and wonder how AML-CTF obligations could be met… but clearly not! It’s a wonder given the bashing that the poor branch staff get for not following these protocols while serving customers over the counter.

    Reply
  3. Fed Up With Big Bank Managemen says:
    8 years ago

    It’s the management and the filthy culture that’s permeates from them within the 4 major banks that needs to be severely reprimanded when these oversights happen and I sure as hell hope its not the staff copping it from within.

    These managers receive huge bonuses on top of their already enormous wages for the evil they wreak, then simply move on to other hugely paid roles, normally just at another bank, with little or no consequence whatsoever.

    If advisers are going to be named and shamed for what we do wrong, why can’t senior management in these banks cop the same treatment? They earn a hell of a lot more money these days then I do now.

    Reply
  4. Pro Broker says:
    8 years ago

    I expect a slap on the wrist for those who are too big to fail…

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Back in March, Tabcorp was fined $45-million for contravening the AML/CTF Act on 108 occasions over 5-years. Can’t wait to see what the fine is for 53,700 breaches….oh hang on, it’s one of the banks.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Why this is the ETF moment for private markets

They unlocked accessibility, slashed costs and opened up diversification across listed asset classes in a way that previously only institutions...

by VentureCrowd
January 20, 2026
Promoted Content

‘We’re not even good yet’: Why advisers must lead Australia’s financial capability uplift

According to Iress and Deloitte’s The Big Lift report, despite decades of reforms, rising wealth, and an increasingly sophisticated advice...

by Iress
January 20, 2026
Promoted Content

Innovation through strategy-led guidance: Q&A with Sheshan Wickramage

What does innovation in the advice profession mean to you?  The advice profession is going through significant change and challenge, and naturally...

by Alex Driscoll
December 23, 2025
Promoted Content

Seasonal changes seem more volatile

We move through economic cycles much like we do the seasons. Like preparing for changes in temperature by carrying an...

by VanEck
December 10, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Video
  • Events
    • ifa Excellence Awards
    • Super Fund Of The Year
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
    • Fund Manager Of The Year
    • AI Summit
    • Australian Wealth Management Summit
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited