X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Banks should foot RC bill: Hanson

Australian senator Pauline Hanson has demanded that the banks pay the cost of the royal commission and argued for the inquiry to probe even “deeper”.

by Jessica Yun
April 23, 2018
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Speaking on on the Seven Network’s Sunrise on Sunday, the Queensland One Nation senator asserted her position on the amount of responsibility major banks should shoulder in the royal commission.

“We need to make the banks pay compensation to the people who have lost their properties, through legal costs, through losing their properties,” Ms Hanson said.

X

“The people must be compensated for this, and it’s going to cost millions of dollars, and they should also pay for the royal commission, not the taxpayer.”

She also added that she wanted to see the royal commission to “go deeper” in its scope of inquiry.

“I want to look at the liquidators, the receivers, the managers. We need to also look at mortgage insurance,” Ms Hanson said.

The royal commission already examined the mortgage and broking industry in its first round of hearings in March and is currently examining financial advice.

The next round of hearings has also been announced for 21 May, with a focus on small and medium-sized enterprises.

Ms Hanson also aimed some criticism at Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull for not calling the royal commission earlier.

“We’ve dealt with them over the last year and a half and we were instrumental from the very first day I met the prime minister, calling for a royal commission into it.

“He wouldn’t give it to us, he was adamant, and then we actually then said: let’s have a senate inquiry, which we did.

“What we started discovering out of that, and the national party knew that we were actually very instrumental in getting evidence out of that, they then started calling for the royal commission,” Ms Hanson said.

In a statement issued on Monday, Mr Turnbull admitted that calling the royal commission so late had been a political blunder.

“I made the decision not to proceed with a Royal Commission and look politically, of course, you’re all right when you say it would have been better for us politically if we’d done so years ago, or several years ago,” Mr Turnbull said.

When asked why he did not go forward with the major enquiry earlier, he said calling a royal commission would have meant delaying reforms into the sector, citing a number of reforms the government had enacted recently.

“We’ve strengthened ASIC. We’ve created a one-stop-shop for consumer complaints against banks and other financial institutions.

“We’ve strengthened penalties. We’ve got them turning up the House Economics Committee to be accountable. We’ve changed the law so that bank executives are accountable.

“There’s been a huge change of reform and now we have a Royal Commission which has got much wider terms of reference than it would have had if it had been set up two years ago,” Mr Turnbull said.

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 3

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Just imagine what the industry funds are doing??? they don’t have to disclose all their fees and charges, where they invest peoples money or compare a clients existing fund before they move them away from another provider! they might have had some inside information 12 months before seeing they have all raised their fees which include investment and insurance premiums.

    funny sounds like vertical integration….

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Are people in government actually naive enough to think that customers will not end up footing the bill one way or another. “Plose explain Pauline” !

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Why ? They didn’t ask for it. Either way the consumer will pay

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited