X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

ATO anti-adviser bias called out

The Australian Tax Office is under pressure over an online hypothetical accused of proliferating negative perceptions of the financial advice profession.

by Staff Writer
October 16, 2017
in News
Reading Time: 1 min read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A number of financial advisers raised concerns about the following post on the ATO website, which features a hypothetical example of a financial adviser providing a consumer with “illegal” information:

Speaking to ifa, Henderson Maxwell principal and Sky News Business host Sam Henderson said the ATO should be held accountable for the damage this kind of implicit bias can have on the livelihood of Australian professionals.

X

“The anti-adviser mindset is pervasive across many channels at the moment, including within our own ranks and associations,” Mr Henderson said.

“Advisers are hard-working people with their clients best interests at heart. I’ve been on the receiving end of criticism to the highest level and frankly it’s exhausting, so disappointing and not reflective of the great value we add to so many people’s lives.

“This ATO comment is divisive, misleading and denigrating to an important industry on the rise.”

The ATO has subsequently amended the post, removing any reference to a financial adviser and replacing the image with the following:

ifa understands that the AFA, FPA and advisers associated with the XY Adviser community group separately voiced concerns to the tax authorities. 

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 11

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    Maybe next time he saw an Accountant and he said just take it from………

    Reply
  2. Nick Shugg says:
    8 years ago

    At SMSF Benchmarks, our initial findings based on over 400 funds, of which around one third are advised, is that one of the reasons large SMSFs out-performed small SMSFs in 2016 was because of the value of advice. The report’s in our Knowledge Centre for those interested.

    Reply
  3. Rob says:
    8 years ago

    Maybe Slater and Gordon can assist with a class action.

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    And the punishment for the ATO staff member?

    If there is no punishment, then this speaks volumes.

    Reply
  5. McGlashen says:
    8 years ago

    What a joke. There are enough people out their offering unlicensed advice, cold calling people, selling property schemes and ASIC are powerless to stop them. So now we’re faced with even ASIC killing the licensed ones off. ASIC needs to offer an apology to every licensed adviser in Australia and send them compensation.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      8 years ago

      as if, the next celebration – after medcraft departing – will be the departure of Peter Kell. I have a calendar crossing off every day until May 2018

      Reply
  6. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    a lot of good advisers assisting people with their entire financial wellbeing. For no recognition … but just a relentless attack from media, ATo, ASIC, online critics. The general public has a perception that advisers that charge a fee are a waste of time and just trying to rip you off. So far from the truth.
    it is about time we (as a collective) responded and put some +ve news out there.

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      8 years ago

      and who are you going to get to address your concerns? the FPA and AFA? nah, they are too busy tweeting to care about your plight pal.

      Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    ATO can take a number behind ASIC!

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      8 years ago

      LOL!

      Reply
  8. Dylan Martin says:
    8 years ago

    Good work on getting this sorted.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited