X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

ASIC reveals latest data on compensation payments for financial advice misconduct

Six of Australia’s largest banking and financial services institutions have paid or offered a total of $4.7 billion in compensation, as at 31 December 2022, to customers who suffered loss or detriment because of fees for no service misconduct or non-compliant advice.

by Reporter
March 10, 2023
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a statement on Friday, the corporate regulator said the $4.7 billion in compensation paid to customers included $1.1 billion paid or offered by the institutions between 1 July and 31 December 2022.

“While this final update on remediation figures draws a line under this program of work — following eight years of addressing financial institutions’ and advisers’ failure to provide ongoing services to fee-paying customers — we will continue to monitor institutions’ processes to complete ongoing work in this area,” said commissioner Danielle Press.

X

AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB, and Westpac undertook the review and remediation programs to compensate affected customers as a result of two major Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) reviews.

ASIC conducted two reviews to investigate the failure of Australian financial institutions to provide ongoing advice services to customers who paid for them, as well as their effectiveness in supervising financial advisers to identify and address “non-compliant advice”.

According to the data provided, for fee for no service misconduct, AMP paid or offered $636.6 million in compensation to 340,573 customers, ANZ paid or offered $308.6 to 79,643 customers, while CBA compensated or offered $1.1 billion, NAB $1.4 billion, Westpac $970.3 million, and Macquarie $4.6 million.    

For non-compliant advice, AMP paid or offered 2,844 customers $42.6 million, ANZ paid or offered $44.7 million to 2,123, while CBA paid or offered $9.4 million to 626 customers. NAB compensated or offered to compensate $114.8 million to 3,034 customers, and Westpac $58.8 million to 3,341 customers.

“ASIC compensation for financial advice related misconduct project has shone a light on the advice fees that customers are paying and the services they should be receiving in return,” said commissioner Press. “The subsequent programs have resulted in very significant remediation payments to affected consumers.”

ASIC said it expects this to be the last compensation update as most programs are complete but noted that it will continue to oversee the remaining ones.

Related Posts

Image/Commonwealth Government

Mulino remains committed to ‘complicated’ DBFO reforms

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
3

Speaking at the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) Conference on the Gold Coast, Financial Services Minister Daniel Mulino...

Advice reform legislation essential for positive results: HGA

by Alex Driscoll
November 13, 2025
0

Speaking on the ifa Show podcast Andrew Gale and Stephen Huppert from the Actuaries Institute’s Help, Guidance and Advice Working...

InterPrac, SQM Research hit with lawsuits over alleged Shield, First Guardian failures

by Keith Ford
November 13, 2025
6

On Thursday morning, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced it has commenced civil penalty proceedings against InterPrac and...

Comments 8

  1. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    And yet the government doesn’t want product providers to contribute to the compensation scheme of last resort.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    Financial Advice represents less than 3% of AFCA complaints Product Providers OVER 50% these historic figures Product Providers – but Advisers have to fund the CSLOR and ASICs litigation even to non-registered fake advisers and influencers? Farsical theft, then the gaul to investigate why advice is “expensive”??? Am I stupid or is Australia a global joke of incompetence when it comes to Advice?

    Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    A great reason to get rid if the SOA, so the conflict of interest can return, with product providers giving advice.

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    So the big banks and AMP cost clients $4.7BILLION but Melissa Caddick gets all the headlines for her $30m fraud. Anyone else would be in jail for this but the big banks and AMP get to run a remediation program and keep their AFSL! The answer to the problems in financial planning are staring us in the face and yet we keep having review after review.

    Reply
  5. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    Yes, and many clients were getting charged the right fees , but they too were paid compensation. Bizarre system of events

    Reply
  6. Old Bob says:
    3 years ago

    Having personal experience of this I wonder how many were actually a case fee for no service versus a case of these firms just writing out a cheque and moving on. In my case it was “in the end we ran out of time and just paid out” …the flow on reputational damage (of being considered a Fee for no service adviser) done to this industry was immense. For me this industry is a death by a thousand cuts.

    So going forward under QoAR, to prevent these issues for Super funds, they’ll be allowed to hide/bury the cost of advice among all members deep in some ongoing product fee.

    Reply
  7. Anonymous says:
    3 years ago

    If ASIC are serious then we need to see ALL Licensees go though the review process. Guaranteed many of the smaller and less governed groups have nowhere near the systems and capability of the 6 mentioned here but ASIC don’t seem to have the same energy and passion for client service with the smaller groups!

    Reply
  8. Banker says:
    3 years ago

    Makes complete sense then to let them give advice again!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited