According to a statement from the regulator, AFSL holder Anne Street Partners Financial Services has agreed to address ASIC’s concerns and make changes to its financial product advice process.
An ASIC surveillance found concerns relating to: “the low balance with which SMSFs were established; the advice not being sufficiently tailored to the needs of each client; inadequate comparison of clients’ existing superannuation to the recommended SMSF; inadequate consideration of suitable alternative strategies that would have met clients’ needs; and inadequate consideration of clients’ long-term retirement planning objectives”.
The surveillance also found issues with the management of conflicts of interest and monitoring of advisers.
The firm will now undertake an independent review into the SMSF advice provided to its clients, and its monitoring and conflicts management processes.
“The decision to establish an SMSF is a significant step for an investor because it involves greater personal responsibility,” said ASIC senior executive leader Louise Macaulay.
“Those providing financial advice must ensure that they take into consideration consumers’ individual circumstances and make sure the advice adequately meets their needs.”
I totally agree with ASIC’s view and have seen too many SMSF start ups that should never have happened. Least of all because the member(s) do not appreciate or understand the trustee requirements. The majority of SMSF are able to enjoy the same managed funds, direct shares and ETF’s etc at a lower cost on a number of good platforms. Lawrence
Gee, on that criteria, most of the SMSFs I have seen would FAIL ASICs test
ASIC will be doing this a lot more and I for one think this is a good thing. There seems to be a (growing) number of planners defaulting clients to an SMSF. This seems very wrong to me on a whole number of levels. Bottom line – bad advice.