The new code will come into effect from 1 January 2020 and will be overseen by a single disciplinary body that is yet to be announced by the government.
AFCA said it will assess adviser conduct by giving the code its practical meaning, taking into account:
- the intention and objectives of the code as a whole and the professional standards framework from which it is derived;
- the current legislative, regulatory and professional environment within which the code operates;
- the FASEA guidance on the operation of the code’s values and standards; and
- ASIC’s expectations about steps licensees should take to ensure their advisers comply with the code and specifically the guidance that they will take a facilitated compliance approach with respect to standards 3 and 7 while FASEA continues to refine its guidance over the period up to the establishment of the single disciplinary body.
Speaking at the FPA Congress last week, AFCA deputy chief ombudsman Dr June Smith announced the approach that the ombudsman scheme will adopt.
“Until the establishment of the single disciplinary body to monitor and enforce the code, AFCA will take a measured and considered approach to interpreting the code’s provisions,” Dr Smith said.
“AFCA will only assess adviser conduct against the code where a complaint and the conduct has occurred after 1 January 2020.”
Dr Smith said the code attempts to improve adviser conduct and ensure they place their clients’ interests first and that they act in a way that is consistent with the values and standards expected of a member of a profession.
“Fairness underpins everything we do at AFCA. In assessing what is a fair resolution of any complaint, AFCA will assess whether the financial firm and its adviser have reasonably met that standard, being mindful that the interpretation of the standard is still being refined via consultation and ongoing rounds of guidance,” Dr Smith said.
“AFCA will continue to use its panel of financial advisers and consumer advocates to assist it in assessing whether financial advisers have met the standards of conduct expected of them by the community and under the code.”
The FPA showed its support for AFCA’s approach, with chief executive Dante De Gori saying AFCA has made it clear it will take a measured and considered approach to interpreting the code’s provisions until the establishment of the single disciplinary body to monitor and enforce the code.
“The FPA fully supports the aim of the code, which will be to improve conduct and ensure all financial planners place their clients’ interests first, and that they act in a way that is consistent with the values and standards expected of our profession,” Mr De Gori said.
“Today’s announcement, along with ASIC’s confirmation earlier in the week on their facilitated compliance approach to standard 3 and 7, provides the much-needed breathing space for financial planners to calmly work through the remaining areas of uncertainty with FASEA over 2020.”




they are gonna butcher us. ASIC and AFCA. they won’t be happy until even 1 single adviser remains. have you ever heard asic or anyone say anything about the good we do. not a single thing. ever. isn’t that odd.
Umm they’re a regulator… Lol.
It’s not their job to go around saying how good we do.
Actually it is part of their role to ensure trust and confidence in the system.
[quote=Anonymous]So no one understands this ambiguous garbage but AFCA and lawyers are going to slaughter us anyway.
they are going to butcher advisers. wholesale butchering. you are mad if you want to remain with this sort of ambiguity and criss cross of regulations.
So no one understands this ambiguous garbage but AFCA and lawyers are going to slaughter us anyway. At least ASIC was logical about it.
I do NOT trust ASIC and especially AFCA to use a measured approach.
FARSEA leaves Advisers as sitting ducks for anyone wanting to complain about anything.
Watch the 2 remaining PI insurers run from this industry all together.
What then ASIC when PI won’t be available to any Advisers ?????
FPA take note now is the time to start jumping up and down that FASEA need to start again… all the regulators have come out and said It will take a [u]measured and considered approach to interpreting the code’s provisions[/u][u][/u]
this is so concerning
Don’t really keep up with the news do we? They sent a 20 page breakdown of each part of the code and submitted it to them.
Lookup FPA – FASEA code of ethics – An impossible Puzzle
I did see it if you are talking about the letter to FASEA, I sent it to our local MP. Guess you trust a[u] measured approach [/u][u][/u] then….. but I don’t. If I was running the FPA and AFA I would be into the government pointing out the fact even the regulators are seeing issues with this code.
They pushed the rules on the code monitoring body, Why can’t the new code of Ethics just start at the same time when the code monitoring body takes effect?…. I don’t really like to have to comply with a law, no body frankly understands how to comply with and run the risk of the regulator doing a look back taking a measured and considered approach