Russell Investments’ “Value of an Adviser” report showed that investors who started 2020 with a portfolio worth $250,000, the impact of staying into the market until 31 May this year – rather than switch to cash in March 2020 at the beginning of the pandemic – was as large as $40,000.
It also estimates that advisers added more than 5.2 per cent p.a., in value to their clients’ portfolios.
“Investors that have been educated by a financial adviser understand there will be ups and downs along their financial journey, so they feel comfortable in staying the course,” Russell Investments director, head of business solutions, Bronwyn Yates, said.
“However, non-advised investors struggle to make the correct decision when markets are volatile, and often attempt to time the market. This is an issue which plagues both those with loss aversion, and those convinced they can beat the market.
“It’s also a timely consideration for the growing ranks of millennials and Gen Z turning to fin-fluencers as their source for financial advice.”
Ms Yates added that the extended lockdowns happening throughout Australia currently should encourage investors to “renew their interest” in the markets and engage with financial advisers.
“While it’s positive that investors across generations are becoming more engaged with their finances, and that they have more guidance options than ever before, the value of professional advice clearly speaks for itself in our report findings,” she said.




Compare the pair.
ASIC are jokes they do not know good advice even when it hits them in the head!
Is there an adviser out there willing to offer to do pro bono work for ASIC employees like they do for the cancer council to prove this to them? You never know they might think the advice is so valuable ASIC will pay you and then charge against all other advisers like they did with Westpac in this article…!
Let’s ask Mr I Hate Advisers Frydenberg why he is trying to destroy Real Advisers ?
Let’s ask ASIC also why they are hell bent on destroying Real Advisers ?
Whilst this should give ASIC more reasons to stop increasing adviser levies they do the opposite…
Licensees should send a message to ASIC about these unsustainable increases by only paying half the levy…
Would $40,000 be enough for ASIC? So far, they have never been on the record as valuing ongoing advice.