X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the ifa bulletin
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
No Results
View All Results
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Adviser slams Kohler’s ‘FOFA socialism’

A Victorian adviser has slammed Alan Kohler’s argument that financial advice is too expensive and believes clients should have the right to choose “which fee-hat fits best”.

by Staff Writer
March 21, 2014
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Speaking to ifa, Brian Handley – who has been in the financial planning industry since 1988 with practices in Gippsland and Geelong – attacked what he called Mr Kohler’s “one size fits all socialist model”.

“Alan Kohler, in essence, is doing a Henry Ford – ‘You can have any colour you like, so long as it’s black’,” Mr Handley said.

X

“This is both arrogant and elitist,” he added.

Mr Handley’s remarks come after ifa published comments by Mr Kohler – from an editorial in The Australian – in which he argues that financial advice is “too expensive” due to over-regulation and simply “not worth it” for consumers.

However, Mr Handley believes clients often prefer a fund under advice (FUA) percentage model.

“Kohler specifically argues that linking adviser service fees to a percentage of FUA is basically a rort,” he said.

“My experience is clients typically prefer the FUA percentage model in lieu of being asked to pay higher upfront fees under the direct fee model.”

Mr Handley argues this also gives clients greater control over fees.

“If the adviser is not providing quality service, the client can turn off the ASF and go somewhere else,” he said.

“The FUA percentage model also makes advice more affordable for working class people and is more akin to paying off the fee over a period of a year. The fee is typically more evenly spread rather than front-end loaded like the direct fee model typically is.”

With more than 20 years in the industry, Mr Handley said he had seen “tenfold cost/benefit ratios” by employing the FUA percentage model.

“If and when fund balances rise, both parties win,” he said, before adding a direct swipe at Mr Kohler.

“Clients are not stupid, Mr Kohler, they don’t stay the course for over 20 years if the value is not there and they certainly don’t refer others to your business.”

Related Posts

How mapping client emotions can transform apprehension into trust

by Keith Ford
November 11, 2025
0

Clients undergo a range of emotional responses throughout the advice process and, according to new financial adviser-led research, advisers’ ability...

Iress launches business efficiency program for FY26

by Olivia Grace-Curran
November 11, 2025
0

The financial services software firm said its renewed focus on core platforms, technology investment and client engagement reflects a leaner,...

Regulator updates guidance for exchange-traded products

by Shy-ann Arkinstall
November 11, 2025
0

ASIC has released a new regulatory guide for exchange-traded products that consolidates previous guidance as the ETF market undergoes significant...

Comments 3

  1. Get real says:
    12 years ago

    Mr Handley can keep pining for the good old days of FUM-based fee trails and lashing out at those that want to disrupt that old model and see the advice industry to move into the 21st century, but I think the majority, including both sides of politics, the peak bodies and majority of planners have moved on. As Henry Ford ultimately did too!

    Reply
  2. Julian Battistella says:
    12 years ago

    I was once upon a time that all my clients were happy operating on a percentage of FUM basis – that is until I surveyed my client base and asked them what their preference was ie % of FUM or flat dollar. 80% of my clients responded to the survey and of those, 75% all stated flat dollar was their preferred way of paying, so I immediately moved all clients onto a flat dollar fee arrangement. Best decision I ever made. Without directly asking your clients the question, you will never actually know what they prefer.

    Reply
  3. Jim Prigg says:
    12 years ago

    Brian Handley speaks as a successful practitioner. He has had a long and successful career looking after his clients who are very loyal to him. Allan Kohler speaks as a successful commentator. He has had a long and successful career commenting, in this case,on something he has never done!!
    Enough of the armchair experts. Let’s listen to successful people who practise, thrive and survive in the “people” industry rather than the chatteratti.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

VIEW ALL
Promoted Content

Private Credit in Transition: Governance, Growth, and the Road Ahead

Private credit is reshaping commercial real estate finance. Success now depends on collaboration, discipline, and strong governance across the market.

by Zagga
October 29, 2025
Promoted Content

Boring can be brilliant: why steady investing builds lasting wealth

Excitement sells stories, not stability. For long-term wealth, consistency and compounding matter most — proving that sometimes boring is the...

by Zagga
September 30, 2025
Promoted Content

Helping clients build wealth? Boring often works best.

Excitement drives headlines, but steady returns build wealth. Real estate private credit delivers predictable performance, even through volatility.

by Zagga
September 26, 2025
Promoted Content

Navigating Cardano Staking Rewards and Investment Risks for Australian Investors

Australian investors increasingly view Cardano (ADA) as a compelling cryptocurrency investment opportunity, particularly through staking mechanisms that generate passive income....

by Underfive
September 4, 2025

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

Poll

This poll has closed

Do you have clients that would be impacted by the proposed Division 296 $3 million super tax?
Vote
www.ifa.com.au is a digital platform that offers daily online news, analysis, reports, and business strategy content that is specifically designed to address the issues and industry developments that are most relevant to the evolving financial planning industry in Australia. The platform is dedicated to serving advisers and is created with their needs and interests as the primary focus.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About IFA

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Risk
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Promoted Content
  • Video
  • Profiles
  • Events

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Risk
  • Events
  • Video
  • Promoted Content
  • Webcasts
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited